Abacus
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,128
You're in trouble if you're relying on good old player 22.What I would say to that is. How many times do you really use those last 4 guys? That $100k could get a better player 22
You're in trouble if you're relying on good old player 22.What I would say to that is. How many times do you really use those last 4 guys? That $100k could get a better player 22
I think we were geared to start strong - exactly the same as the Dragons. A slower start and Griffin would have been gone by Origin.Early on we were amazing but after the Dragons game we fell away. Maybe if we sack the coach sooner we don't fall away or maybe depth wasn't able to sustain the level required for that long of period
You're in trouble if you're relying on good old player 22.
Sad to say I miss MX too. What are the odds.I think we’ve just gone the unconventional route of spreading our cap further with less ‘marquee’ players. Our recent injury history may have something to do with working it that way. Not sure I agree our depth is weak, we were top 4 the majority of the year with a heavily depleted squad most of the time. Can it take us to winning the comp? Not sure, I think we’ll find out over the next 2 - 3 years.
I like Franklin’s input, I don’t necessarily agree with him on this point though. Don’t mute the bloke, just keep discussing, it’s what keeps this place ticking.
Ps. MX muted me & i think we’re all poorer for it. No one bites as hard as him.
Not sure how often you get to the games but if you do, maybe you can put together a banner to show your support of player 22? Or maybe contact the club with a TPA - but only for player 22.It's NRL injuries happen. Origin time guys get rested so you need a strong 18-24 or so.
So mute then. It's off season so no footy and our depth looks weak like it did last year. Whatelse do you talk about
I think we were geared to start strong - exactly the same as the Dragons. A slower start and Griffin would have been gone by Origin.
By my calculations we used at least 28 players last season and needed every one of them, even Caleb Aekins who had a great one and only appearance.
What I would say to that is. How many times do you really use those last 4 guys? That $100k could get a better player 22
The current rules are a joke. You should be able to use any player in your squad at any time. Its all very sillyBy my calculations we used at least 28 players last season and needed every one of them, even Caleb Aekins who had a great one and only appearance.
He wasn't FT squad though. Neither was Ellis at the time of his debut
Teams would use this as a means to cheat the cap.The current rules are a joke. You should be able to use any player in your squad at any time. Its all very silly
Teams would use this as a means to cheat the cap.
There 's been barely a mention about the acquisition of Tyrell Fuimaono but he could be really good for us if he avoids the injury issues that plagued him last season. Equally adept in the centres or second row. In form, fit, injury free I can see him in our top 17.
I am hoping to be wrong but rarely does keep doing the same thing get a different result
Nope you just setup that cap in a way that everyone under it can play. Its very VERY simple stuffTeams would use this as a means to cheat the cap.
Nope you just setup that cap in a way that everyone under it can play. Its very VERY simple stuff