- Messages
- 100,992
Are you capable of arguing like a human being?So what is the alternative? Just do nothing
Nobody's saying "just do nothing", we're literally saying comparisons to AFL are overwrought and unhelpful to growing the NRL.
Are you capable of arguing like a human being?So what is the alternative? Just do nothing
FFS mate... That's not what I'm saying, what I'm saying is, maybe, for sanity sake, use a different f**king comparison? Do you just like arguing? I'm not even disagreeing with you mate, just stating that surely there are other comparisons. But I can already see your response arguing with me about something I didn't even say...So what is the alternative? Just do nothing
Are you capable of arguing like a human being?
Nobody's saying "just do nothing", we're literally saying comparisons to AFL are overwrought and unhelpful to growing the NRL.
FFS mate... That's not what I'm saying, what I'm saying is, maybe, for sanity sake, use a different f**king comparison? Do you just like arguing? I'm not even disagreeing with you mate, just stating that surely there are other comparisons. But I can already see your response arguing with me about something I didn't even say...
Comparing the NRL and AFL memberships gets tiring because of the following reasons:
As mentioned earlier, comparisons can be good when identifying a particular initiative or a learning from their experience - but simply NRL vs AFL offers very little knowledge.
- AFL has placed greater emphasis on membership for a long period of time. It has had a much longer time to grow as it has always been pushed. NRL's push has only been within the last decade.
- AFL historically is more attached to family. Teams are supported by families through the generations - this is not nearly as frequent in the NRL. Kids follow teams of their choosing.
- NRL is a better TV product than AFL as most of play can occur within the TV screen, whilst AFL utilises are larger field where play off screen is vital to play. As such, attending an NRL is not as critical.
- Melbourne vs Sydney comparisons are pointless - They are the two largest cities in Australia but are very different geographically which has a significant effect of people's ability to efficiently interact with their clubs.
This x 1000.Comparing the NRL and AFL memberships gets tiring because of the following reasons:
As mentioned earlier, comparisons can be good when identifying a particular initiative or a learning from their experience - but simply NRL vs AFL offers very little knowledge.
- AFL has placed greater emphasis on membership for a long period of time. It has had a much longer time to grow as it has always been pushed. NRL's push has only been within the last decade.
- AFL historically is more attached to family. Teams are supported by families through the generations - this is not nearly as frequent in the NRL. Kids follow teams of their choosing.
- NRL is a better TV product than AFL as most of play can occur within the TV screen, whilst AFL utilises are larger field where play off screen is vital to play. As such, attending an NRL is not as critical.
- Melbourne vs Sydney comparisons are pointless - They are the two largest cities in Australia but are very different geographically which has a significant effect of people's ability to efficiently interact with their clubs.
If the AFL comparisons were being brought in with "these initiatives work in AFL, could we look at these", it would probably be worth looking at.
As it stands, they're being brought in for no other reason to cast a negative light on the NRL rather than be productive, so no, they're not helpful. That's my point. So in summary @franklin2323, we probably agree, but you like an argument even more than me, it would seem.
Penrith 4th and a chance to crack 20k before the season starts. Unreal considering no finals last season or new stadium this year.
This x 1000.
Few in NRL land talked about membership until around the Centenary season, and the growth since then is actually fantastic. We used to be stoked with the overall number cracking 200,000, now anything less than 300,000 is a failure. It's all relative.
I completely agree with the TV vs attendance when it comes to comparing the sports. Some have dismissed that - each to their own - but NRL is clearly a better sport on TV, while AFL is clearly a better at-the-ground experience when it comes to watching the game. How we can better that for the NRL i'm just not sure.
The Melbourne v Sydney comparisons are absolutely pointless - extraordinarily different geographically. Melbourne is simply easier to get around.
Very impressive, are they doing anything special to achieve this?
Its interesting when we look at TV as a lot of our TV audience comes from regional NSW (where it might not be easy to attend a game unless you're in Newcastle) and Brisbane (which only has one club which gives no choice for those that dislike the corporate Broncos). So on paper it looks like we have more TV viewers therefore more fans so therefore why not more members, when in reality we might not have more fans in the areas where NRL clubs are based? Just a thought as to why there is a discrepancy between the two codes?
If the AFL comparisons were being brought in with "these initiatives work in AFL, could we look at these", it would probably be worth looking at..
I think it’s a myriad of things. Our marketing has gone up levels. Our community and schools engagement has gone up levels. Our social media game has gone from mediocre to the best in the country. Ever since Gus came here in 2011 he’s put in the work and almost a decade later we have experienced continuous membership growth every year taking us from one of the smallest membership bases to one of the highest.Very impressive, are they doing anything special to achieve this?
I think it’s a myriad of things. Our marketing has gone up levels. Our community and schools engagement has gone up levels. Our social media game has gone from mediocre to the best in the country. Ever since Gus came here in 2011 he’s put in the work and almost a decade later we have experienced continuous membership growth every year taking us from one of the smallest membership bases to one of the highest.
If the AFL comparisons were being brought in with "these initiatives work in AFL, could we look at these", it would probably be worth looking at.
As it stands, they're being brought in for no other reason to cast a negative light on the NRL rather than be productive, so no, they're not helpful. That's my point. So in summary @franklin2323, we probably agree, but you like an argument even more than me, it would seem.
I think it’s a myriad of things. Our marketing has gone up levels. Our community and schools engagement has gone up levels. Our social media game has gone from mediocre to the best in the country. Ever since Gus came here in 2011 he’s put in the work and almost a decade later we have experienced continuous membership growth every year taking us from one of the smallest membership bases to one of the highest.
if you want to see a key reason why jump on the sharks forum and read the experiences of fans trying to buy memberships, it’s farcical!