- Messages
- 7,901
No he passed it to Edwards who tipped it on to Whare.
The one from this year against the Raiders? I didn't think Edwards touched it.
No he passed it to Edwards who tipped it on to Whare.
No he passed it to Edwards who tipped it on to Whare.
The one from this year against the Raiders? I didn't think Edwards touched it.
100% he does. It becomes his team.I think Cleary plays better when Jimmy isn't there.
I said in the description the examples aren't exhaustive. It's meant as a discussion point as I'm working on a proper video. It does prove the point that he is capable which you have said he isn't. I said in the video it isn't happening regularly like it should. My hypothesis is coaching issues.
The kicks show are to show his vision.
When he throws a 10-15m cut out that hit Whare or the right winger on the outside of his opponent then get back to me.
One like these;
When he throws a 10-15m cut out that hit Whare or the right winger on the outside of his opponent then get back to me.
One like these;
Both Jimmy and Cleary have that pass in their arsenal but how often do we see it? I wonder why? We never stand deep enough for cutout balls like that.
Right on, splashed way too much cash on a mediocre halfIf Clearly’s attacking play doesn’t improve without Maloney, what then?
I mean it’ll be his fifth season, he will have played over 100 games by the end of next season. Pretty sure we’re very close to the point where what you see is what you get. I think we may have passed it personally.
genuinely think it’s false hope to think he’s all of a sudden going to have game vision without Maloney.
If Clearly’s attacking play doesn’t improve without Maloney, what then?
I mean it’ll be his fifth season, he will have played over 100 games by the end of next season. Pretty sure we’re very close to the point where what you see is what you get. I think we may have passed it personally.
genuinely think it’s false hope to think he’s all of a sudden going to have game vision without Maloney.
He had game vision before Maloney. I've Said I'll accept being wrong but something seems to be up since Maloney started. It could be something as simple as Maloney's dominant personality.
No one is saying that but yes 2020 is the make or break year for Nathan.If Clearly’s attacking play doesn’t improve without Maloney, what then?
I mean it’ll be his fifth season, he will have played over 100 games by the end of next season. Pretty sure we’re very close to the point where what you see is what you get. I think we may have passed it personally.
genuinely think it’s false hope to think he’s all of a sudden going to have game vision without Maloney.
He did? 10 assists in 2017.
9 assists this year.
His stats over his four seasons are almost identical, main thing that changed was kicking meters.
He’s just not an attacking half, which is a problem because we’re bad in attack, and the 7’s main job is to create points. If we’re going to improve in attack it’s not going to be because of Cleary.
Have a look at that video. The kicks for tries he does are off the cuff just seeing an opportunity. That's vision.
No one is saying that but yes 2020 is the make or break year for Nathan.
Have a look at that video. The kicks for tries he does are off the cuff just seeing an opportunity. That's vision.
A few examples doesn’t prove anything, no one is saying he isn’t occasionally capable of producing a good play. The problem is he’s not consistently capable of doing it.
You say in the video that a lack of tactical coaching could be contributing, what I’m referring to is natural game vision, something a player has without coaching.
Cleary may well be able to run set plays, but he’s not consistently able to play what’s in front of him.