Smug Panther
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,004
Yeah that's what I said....So opposition didn’t kick to our edges ?
Yeah that's what I said....So opposition didn’t kick to our edges ?
Hed be the 2nd quickest in our team. I definitley wouldnt describe him as not quick.You missed my point, I wasn’t saying it should be Staines, I’m saying it doesn’t need to be a super strong ball returner. Because of Edwards & To’o, we have the opportunity to have a more specialist winger, whoever that may be.
But I disagree on Crichton, your best centre should be playing in the centres, not the wing. He also not particularly quick.
Or he just actually got of his wing and went looking for the ball, an offload, any opportunity.I will say one thing in defence of Staines, though. If you’re putting a guy out there who’s undersized, you need to come up with some plays to take advantage of his skills. Staines didn’t get enough chances to show off his pace.
I wouldn't if everyone's fit but Spencer has been injured and needs a run. He may yet be required at some point.Would anyone want Spencer in over Sorenson? I think Sorensons forms been awesome.
Tago,Spencer,Staines,Naden,Kenny give plenty of depth. But I feel this is your best side. Amd that includes Momorski.
We dumped Sauce who still made good meters and improved
Would anyone want Spencer in over Sorenson? I think Sorensons forms been awesome.
Tago,Spencer,Staines,Naden,Kenny give plenty of depth. But I feel this is your best side. Amd that includes Momorski.
A slow winger who's always been terrible under the high ball. Yes we are better without him. He was fantastic for us and carried a forward pack of bums early on but we evolved past himWhat player across our 17 hasn't improved?
Would we of not been just as good without sauce?
The side is stacked, Guys last year that were rookies are now rep players. That is why the team is better, not any one particular player being in or out of the side
A slow winger who's always been terrible under the high ball. Yes we are better without him. He was fantastic for us and carried a forward pack of bums early on but we evolved past him
Hed be the 2nd quickest in our team. I definitley wouldnt describe him as not quick.
Your point doesnt really add up to anything tho?
Charlies out of form or just not good enough for wing yet.
Nadens got to many mistakes in him.
Mays to inexperienced.
Who else shall we put there?
Critta offers x factor, is safer and makes less mistakes, best under high ball at the club, much stronger returner of the ball and a better defender.
It might not need to be a super strong ball runner but you get that with critta anyway plus all the other perks i mentioned.
Yes hes a centre but i think ivans doing whats best for team, not just playing critta at centre because hes strictly a centre.
I wouldnt describe naden or Staines as specialist wingers. They both can play wing. Naden is probs always going to be stuck between wing and centre. Charlies a fb. Taylan has played a mix of wing and centre coming through but hed the closest to a specialist you alude to. But no way hes playing this late in the season.
People are upset critta is wing but its th best option for the team right now.
Naden somehow creates overlaps for the opposition when we have excess defensive players on an edge.
Momo outside of a poor miss against the Sharks has locked down the right side every game he's played.
While it's not ideal I prefer the Momo/Crichton combo for now.
I wouldn't if everyone's fit but Spencer has been injured and needs a run. He may yet be required at some point.
He was not that bad.A poor season for Spencer. Very young but I expected him to be one of the better props in your side.
Fair enough mate.My point is in the larger scheme of things, it’s not necessarily about what we need to do right now.
But with Staines out of form, and Crichton better in the centres, I would play Naden on the right wing. His defensive issues are much less of a concern on the wing. Ivan is too defensive when we get to the pointy end of the season.
All that matters is no injuries or suspensions.We realistically could top 80 here, but will probably put the cue back in the rack at some point.