That's gracious of you to think what no other team has done before and is unlikely to ever do in the future as "admirable" as it was just a 10 team local comp. I assume you also think Bradman's test average of 99.94 is OK as there were only a handful of test playing nations in those days.
On your thinking what Penrith has achieved by defending their title is nothing special given that it was also achieved by the Rooster's just 3 years ago.
No need for the sarcasm. We were discussing the teams that go back to back and where they rank. I am giving valid reasons why I don't think the St George teams 11 in a row is as good as the Raiders, Broncos, Roosters, or the Storm. The fact is indisputable that the competition was local, wasn't as competitive and had no restrictions on it. The Devils 8 in ten years deserves equal consideration if we are comparing like with like. For some reason everybody dismisses Queensland teams, yet as soon as Brisbane joined the NRL they were very competitive. Within six seasons they were crowned premiers, ironically against St George.
It was a good achievement, but I would be more impressed if they played anybody outside the Sydney metropolitan area. This whole "St George where the greatest team ever" mantra is as valid as Americans saying they won the World Series.
As for the Panthers, I think what we achieved is indeed very good, especially considering how competitive the NRL is now. It does at least encompass the best that Queensland has to offer, NZ Melbourne and Canberra. We would be in consideration for the best NRL team ever if we can threepeat. I hope we do.