tri_colours
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,944
According to Grant we got over $1.9b once all international rights came in. Which is part of our broadcast contract.
But you are right, Smiths stuff-up benefited the AFL greatly.
Last edited:
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Link? every report I’ve seen has said either $75mill or $100mil over 5 years
Yes I know, I’m just explaining for the less Informed on here why our surplus may look so healthy.
No it’ll be based on facts, or whatever evidence is a available, not your nonsense methodology of make sht up only to be proved wrong time after time!
The Sydney Morning Herald revealed last week that Foxtel had agreed to hand over an additional $20 million annually over the next five years to the NRL, which will provide financial support for a 17th team based in Brisbane. That is over and above a five-year extension struck last year during the coronavirus pandemic.
it looks healthy due to good management ...
haha now that's some reading between the lines! Fox are paying between $15-20mill a year for 5 years! Not that PLUS $25mill a year. If that was true that would be $45mill a year for just 12 extra games no extra time slot lol. Given in the last deal FOX paid $24.3mill for each time slot how likely do you think your fudging of the figures is??
Maybe, or it maybe just that having the extra revenue from last years origin plus the reduce spending on development and community has created it. Time will tell. I'll wave the bunting when I see how its been achieved and not before.
hahaha
it won't matter to a biased clown like you , you'll just find something else to whine about & get wrong
seems like you're the only whining dribbler on here not seeing its 200 million plus for one extra team despite the evidence
So once again you have zero evidence of fox exclusivity or that they are not paying the $15 or $20mill that everyone has quoted them as paying. you're dreaming if you think Fox is paying $45mill a year for 12 games lol Maybe you should stick to telling us how you can't build on sandhahaha
reading between what lines you idiot
the words , financial support , over and above , additional . Its in addition to the media rights deal you moaning halfwit
possibly the payoff to ensure redcliffe got the license which was the least impacting on news ltd's team the broncos.
& what , you think 9 are getting the extra games paying exactly the same amount they did in the last deal .. 78 games n reps & now 90 games n reps ? hahahah
you're a clown.
foxtel are getting them & as the article says will be paying 25 million a year for them. .. 45 mill extra a year good work PVL... now we just need Brisb 3 & NZ 2 in the next 10 years
hahaha
reading between what lines you idiot
the words , financial support , over and above , additional . Its in addition to the media rights deal you moaning halfwit
possibly the payoff to ensure redcliffe got the license which was the least impacting on news ltd's team the broncos.
& what , you think 9 are getting the extra games paying exactly the same amount they did in the last deal .. 78 games n reps & now 90 games n reps ? hahahah
you're a clown.
foxtel are getting them & as the article says will be paying 25 million a year for them. .. 45 mill extra a year good work PVL... now we just need Brisb 3 & NZ 2 in the next 10 years
they aren't paying 45 mill for the 12 games you peanutSo once again you have zero evidence of fox exclusivity or that they are not paying the $15 or $20mill that everyone has quoted them as paying. you're dreaming if you think Fox is paying $45mill a year for 12 games lol Maybe you should stick to telling us how you can't build on sand
no one aimed for it , it was required because we weren't ready for 2 teams at once.
Generally if a CEO of a company comes out and makes an official statement in the media then yeh I'm going to take that as evidence until something else proves otherwise. Even if media quote figures then its something to go off until other evidence shows different, they don't always get it right but often no smoke without fire in the world of sport journalism.they aren't paying 45 mill for the 12 games you peanut
they're paying 25 mill
the extra 100 mill was to bankroll expansion , cover the dolphins grant etc .. ya know
like the article says 10 times at least lol
no evidence eh
so the AFL says its increasing its deal by 55 million with..... NO .. evidence & indeed theres evidence to suggest its utter BS
but theres no
"if you believes" from you is there ?
& you wonder why people think you're a clown
ministryofsport.com.au
au.sports.yahoo.com
Because we are weak, lack strategy and make decisions on the whim of whichever chairman is in power. Plans for two new clubs should have begun in 2012 when the ARLC took over and been in place for selling of 2017 rights. We should now be talking about whose going to be 19 and 20 in 2028!
