Matua
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,112
Yeah NZ rugby is done for if overseas eligibility is opened up.Yep I get what you’re saying but again, other than Mounga and Frizel, I’m struggling to think of any overseas based players who are any better than those based at home?
The down side to opening up eligibility is it’ll completely gut SR which is already on its knees. If we’re going to pay that price it should only be because the alternative is worse but IMO we’re still coping pretty well for now.
And the reality is we're losing the lower players rather than the big ones, and TBF the advent of USA rugby has meant we're retaining more of them for NPC as they can supplement the income each way.
We don't want to to get to a stage like the Kiwis in the 90s where we don't have some of our best players for test because they're playing in the wrong hemisphere or they rush back for 48 hour round trips.
Razor was stupid to bring it up twice, especially for Mo'unga (and the flake Frizell).
Can you name a player from the NH who would have been an automatic selection for the RWC last year? I regularly see people mentioned Luatua, and can only assume nobody watched Samoa play at all.I mean not selecting them - I think there should be preference for players here, but why would you not pick the best players - especially those playing in UK and France where the standard is very high... Japan you'd have to evaluate more closely