What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023 TV/Fox/Streaming Ratings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
4,614
Mate that`s a bullshit answer that bloke gave you. The cross over between winter sports esp. League and cricket would be minimal. I know blokes who prefer to play Touch football in the off-season than boring f**king cricket.
Cricket would be dead if it weren`t for the new short forms and even with them we`ll see how long the novelty lasts. They may well go the same way as 50 over, which is dead now as well.
BTW. you don`t need to be fit to play cricket.
You don't need to be fit to play Cricket ???

mmm all that running up and down the wicket in full kit countless times/chasing cricket balls around the ground and fast bowlers with those long run ups bowling 20 plus overs all in hot and humid conditions.

No they don't need to be fit :rolleyes:

Try the 1800's and up to prior to full time professionalism

Cricket has been played in one form or another since the 1500's

It was fairly common for players of any of the football codes to play cricket and even Baseball in Summer prior to full time professionalism coming in.

It didn't have to be at 1st class level either

Cricket changed as well as they play a lot more during a calendar year than they did 20 or 30 years - tests/ ODI/ T-20's and T-20 tournaments

Could not play both nowadays even if you were very good at both - you would have to choose one over the other.

No time anyway - 8 or so weeks after an NRL season finishes they are back at pre-season training

To name a few that did combine playing league and then cricket at 1st class and International level during their careers

Graeme Hughes played top flight League and also Cricket and played Cricket for NSW.

Herbie Collins an Eastern Suburbs League premiership winning player in the early 1910's played cricket as well - 19 tests for Australia.

Ray Lindwall played for St George in League and Cricket for Australia
 
Last edited:

Vibing

Juniors
Messages
2,117
Cricket only affected the nrl average not the afl ?

lmao
Who said it didn't ?
it affected them too , with them losing about 100K on their Thursday & Friday games , but they had 4 nationally covered games on FTA , one extra
covering this & then some

heres 20c
buy a clue
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,617
Who said it didn't ?
it affected them too , with them losing about 100K on their Thursday & Friday games , but they had 4 nationally covered games on FTA , one extra
covering this & then some

heres 20c
buy a clue
So they beat us by a record amount for this season and the fact it’s during origin is a coincidence

Lmao
 

Vibing

Juniors
Messages
2,117
So they beat us by a record amount for this season and the fact it’s during origin is a coincidence

Lmao
Absolutely it is
our ratings would have been about 5..3 mill with no cricket & a holiday in QLD on Monday( season av)
theres would have been the same without their 4th nationally televised game

nothing to see here ...
 

Dark Corner

Juniors
Messages
1,588
FA Cup final yesterday. I forgot that was on. City won. Couldn't care less anymore.

English Soccer season still going in June. They'll start pre-season in July.
FA Cup final used to be on in the 2nd week of May and the tradition was most people, fans and families would sit down and watch even if their team wasn't in it and it's what got me into Rugby League as remember when I was a kid turning on the TV at the start of May thinking it was strange that the FA Cup final was on early in 1993 but lo and behold it was Wigan v Widnes Challenge Cup Final and that started by love affair of Rugby both high's and Low's X
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,537
Apparently it drags the good teams down to the level of the crap teams, and somehow the NRl consider this a positive lol
 
Messages
800
Apparently it drags the good teams down to the level of the crap teams, and somehow the NRl consider this a positive lol
The NRL have never claimed that clubs losing players to Origin is intrinsically positive. They've just decided that the current arrangement brings more positives and fewer negatives than any alternative.

One option is to shut the comp down mid-season. Those on this forum who believe crowds and ratings take a hit during Origin might like to set out the benefits of reducing NRL crowds and ratings to zero for several weeks. I'm struggling to see how that would help maintain momentum for the year.

The other option is to play Origin post-season. In that scenario, we could kiss goodbye to international RL.

A wide disparity of game-time between the best and the rest is not practical. In such a physically demanding sport, the top players cannot be available and firing for Origin, internationals, finals, and every regular-season game. Something has to give.

I've heard teachers and coaches of school and junior club teams who've toured Oz in the past decade or so report that some of their opponents expressed surprise that English people play RL. Pundits talk of "developing" the game in NZ as though they think RL arrived there in 1995 with the Warriors. There seems to be a generation, maybe two, who have grown up assuming that RL is a uniquely Australian game in the same mould as Aussie Rules.

The resultant binary code-war mindset prompts insular fans to use Origin and internationals as a stick to wave at AFL when it suits but then be the first to bemoan the disruption to the NRL schedule caused by rep fixtures. Last year there were even complaints about a possible impact on the NRL pre-season from the RLWC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top