Foreign Legion
Coach
- Messages
- 11,722
Yea, not sure how you can do a "Up there Kazaly" with a set of hooters?The skill level is appalling. Even for afl. The tv ratings reflect the pathetic level of the game.
Yea, not sure how you can do a "Up there Kazaly" with a set of hooters?The skill level is appalling. Even for afl. The tv ratings reflect the pathetic level of the game.
Problem is that the competition grew too quickly, is far too big, requires far too many players and is a diminished product as a result. The game is ugly enough as it is without having such low quality athletes kicking the ball ten metres to nobody.Yea, not sure how you can do a "Up there Kazaly" with a set of hooters?
So you assume everyone on LU follows your twitter.
Bloody hell you must be the popular kid. hahahaha
Posting a conparison when the nrl still had two rounds to go was disingenuous to say the least
thanks very much for clearing up the inaccuracy and keeping me properly informed
Usually don’t get fox data for a few days
LolYou can blame Foxtel for the comparison at all. They did the media thing with Mediaweek that gave us the Foxgroup ratings for both the AFL and NRL at this time of the season. They also didnt mention the last two weeks of the round.
I try.
It hasn`t mate, I flicked on one their games today and it was awful, even the commentator was saying how poor the quality was, for a fumbleball commentator that`s a big call. My son came out of his room and asked why I was laughing, I said just watch this. LOL.I haven't seen a wafl game in years, that version of their game does not require the same size fields as the men. The grounds are far too big in the female version of their game.l thus it produces an ugly spectical. As I said, I haven't seen the game in years,it could be better than back. I wouldn't know.
Wookie recommenced sharing in the BF ratings thread last week. Rather than go the whole of August without a single post to show.no wonder why the fumblers don’t talk about ratings
Just watched a "Last two minutes" YouTube video of Geelong/Melbourne AFLW. No thrills, countless spills.Problem is that the competition grew too quickly, is far too big, requires far too many players and is a diminished product as a result. The game is ugly enough as it is without having such low quality athletes kicking the ball ten metres to nobody.
The funniest bit is that the afl has spent so much time in the media telling us how fantastic the players are that they actually believe it and are demanding to play on the same grounds and under the same rules as the men. You reap what you sow.It hasn`t mate, I flicked on one their games today and it was awful, even the commentator was saying how poor the quality was, for a fumbleball commentator that`s a big call. My son came out of his room and asked why I was laughing, I said just watch this. LOL.
Looks like using that reach nonsense didn’t get the hoped for tractionWookie recommenced sharing in the BF ratings thread last week. Rather than go the whole of August without a single post to show.
With a purported 110k members, must get a bit lonely. Evokes the Rime of the Ancient Mariner -
"Water, water, everywhere,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, everywhere,
Nor any drop to drink"
Reach isn’t nonsense. It just requires context. It’s a valid measurement as long as it’s put in the right context.Looks like using that reach nonsense didn’t get the hoped for traction
Reach isn’t nonsense. It just requires context. It’s a valid measurement as long as it’s put in the right context.
It isn’t meaningless. That’s just a silly thing to say. I think it’s of limited use but it isn’t meaningless.Reach has been around from day Dot.
And it’s as meaningless then as it is now.
Looks like using that reach nonsense didn’t get the hoped for traction