What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2025 Origin 2 - Wed 18 Jun - NSW v QLD @ Optus

Who wins Game II?


  • Total voters
    15
  • This poll will close: .
Messages
2,444
No, however you seem to make a lot of posts aggressively missing the point. Nobody ever said a five eighth is incapable of being best on ground
I didn't miss the point at all. Munster was the "main influencer" as you put it in those games.

I could add the time Darren Lockyer played with Shane Perry in 06 too. Surely you don't think Perry was the main half in that Broncos team?

Maybe your point isn't as strong as you think it is

Being wrong happens mate, best to accept it gracefully
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
106,027
I didn't miss the point at all. Munster was the "main influencer" as you put it in those games.

I could add the time Darren Lockyer played with Shane Perry in 06 too. Surely you don't think Perry was the main half in that Broncos team?

Maybe your point isn't as strong as you think it is

Being wrong happens mate, best to accept it gracefully

Of course you didn't. That would require you to reflect on the fact that pedantry doesn't make you as intelligent as you pretend it does.

Although to that point, you might expect that a literalist or a pedant would understand the use of the word generally. But on the other hand, you definitely hold to type with your assumption that the number on a players back is the only indicator of their role in the side.

If the worst thing I've done today is word something just imperfectly enough that it opened me up to being told I was wrong by a quibbler's internet avatar, you can rest assured I won't be needing to dig into my reserves of grace. I'm not especially bothered whether anyone agrees with me or not, as long as the discussion is interesting enough. Pedants generally aren't accused of being interesting.
 

SBD82

Coach
Messages
17,950
Luai was great last year. Broke the game open when it was in the balance. Thought he was pretty unlucky to have been left out of game 1 this year.
 

TroyJax

Juniors
Messages
342
Luai was great last year. Broke the game open when it was in the balance. Thought he was pretty unlucky to have been left out of game 1 this year.
He’s been playing like shit for the Tigers. He isn’t a leader’s arsehole.
Now he’s back with Cleary, he can assume his natural position as the subservient and do what he is told.
 

SBD82

Coach
Messages
17,950
He’s been playing like shit for the Tigers. He isn’t a leader’s arsehole.
Now he’s back with Cleary, he can assume his natural position as the subservient and do what he is told.
Have you considered the possibility that Luai isn’t shit, but your club is?
 
Messages
2,444
Of course you didn't. That would require you to reflect on the fact that pedantry doesn't make you as intelligent as you pretend it does.

Although to that point, you might expect that a literalist or a pedant would understand the use of the word generally. But on the other hand, you definitely hold to type with your assumption that the number on a players back is the only indicator of their role in the side.

If the worst thing I've done today is word something just imperfectly enough that it opened me up to being told I was wrong by a quibbler's internet avatar, you can rest assured I won't be needing to dig into my reserves of grace. I'm not especially bothered whether anyone agrees with me or not, as long as the discussion is interesting enough. Pedants generally aren't accused of being interesting.
The length of your post suggests otherwise

You made a statement, I pointed out that said statement was not really true and gave examples of fact, you had a cry and called me names. Perhaps the internet isn't a place for one as sensitive as you
 

Latest posts

Top