What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

24 hours till Anti Tampering Deadline

Messages
377
Well we are only 2 days away from the June 30th Anti Tampering deadline and these clowns that have been entrusted to run our Club still have no F'n idea how much money they have to spend under the cap.

This is an absolute disgrace. How can we effectively compete in the player market without plans or even knowing how much money we have to spend. Looks like the record we didnt quite break in 2005 may still be able to be beaten in 2006 if the 10 players we are shedding are gooorne and we have nobody to replace them.

No wonder Mr Conway, Pringle, Crowey and Chief have all been quiet in the media these last few days despite our awesome victory against the chocolate soldiers.

Has anyone else heard IF we will be buying anyone except Davico and a star back? Maybe the Eels will need to release Tahu early like we did the year before? He's in good form and still a SOO quality back.

Thats right we seem to be the only club in the NRL that cant add up to $3.25M and lets players go to make room for UPPGRADES
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,256
Why would we want Tahu back? A very poor centre on very big money - remember he isn't a winger any more...
 

eddo

Juniors
Messages
942
You idjit.
Players managers would love the club to come out & say ...
"We have $X to offer this bloke" & "$Y for some one else"

It would certainly make the managers job easy.
I don't blame the club for keeping their cards close their chests.
 
Messages
377
eddo said:
You idjit.
Players managers would love the club to come out & say ...
"We have $X to offer this bloke" & "$Y for some one else"

It would certainly make the managers job easy.
I don't blame the club for keeping their cards close their chests.

No you double idjit. All I was saying is it would be nice.. if like the Bunnies the Knights could say.. we ahve $xxxM to spend IN TOTAL
 

Nuffy

Bench
Messages
4,075
I must say I'm very concerned about the current status of the team and potential team for 06.

I notice that Davico has taken a step back, lets hope we don't pull a Reynoldson and throw money at him just to save face.

It beggars belief that we haven't managed to get Abes over the line yet, as for the rest I wouldn't bother.

But I just can't see us landing anyone of ANY note due to the shambles that has become our recruitment / retention team.

I will say, and I thought that he was squeezed out, but Sarge didn't seem to run a very tight ship re player contracts but I'll add a disclaimer in that I think the CEO has a part to play in all this.

As for Crowe trying to work out our financial situation re the cap, I'd have thought that Sarge would have a rolling spreadsheet for this type of thing and if he didn't, I could make one in about an hour.

We aren't talking about preparing the final account for BHP here, its a 3.25M salary cap that includes dumping 10 blokes on salaries of between 240k and say 50K.

We just don't seem to be proactive in any part of this club AND IT MUST STOP NOW!!!
 

Vanilla Dice

Juniors
Messages
13
I think its time that some of the posters who continually knock the teams administration outed themsleves and their personal aspirations for office within the club

They have some data and none of that in context meaning they have NO REAL information. Noone outside of the official loop can understand the complexities of adjustments for long term injuries, the new sponsor allowances, the increase of base salary cap based on increased team sponsorship since 2001. On top of all this there is the hangover from the Hill years with player payments backended to keep there short term view of the world.

I go on official announcments and media stories and since Hill has left I have seen

1. A new Sponsorship Manager
2. A Managed Resignation of a football manger
3. A New Naming Rights Sponsor
4. Confirmation of deliberate and thoughtfull talks with wests
5. A win
6. An open statement on the position of the salary cap and the difficulties they face fitting new players under it
7. Negotiation of the Real NRL to guarantee an overdraft should it be required

And a general willingness to share information and transparency of operation that never took place in the old Power Tower days.

We are all armchair experts who can say well I would have no sponsor problems and I would have x and I would buy y and I would have full time arsewipers for all the players. The bottom line is that there is a team of people who have to make decisions on the numbers they have and react to situations like Bathurst. There are always comprises and never utopian solultions

I love my club and I am encouraged by the new direction that Tyler has seemingly bought to the organisation. Remember it was Tyler who brought Conway to the job in the first place. Maybe these guys were meant to work together.

So all you knockers put up or shut up. I personally tipped a 5 figure amount into the club this year so what have you done and what are you willing to do?

Most posters here also love the club they live the dream and die the deaths with the players. We harbor no ambitions other than to see our guys do well, you few guys are abusing our passion for personal gain.

Shame on you!
 
Messages
377
Nuffy said:
I must say I'm very concerned about the current status of the team and potential team for 06.

We just don't seem to be proactive in any part of this club AND IT MUST STOP NOW!!!

Nuffy Sarge DID have an ongoing spreasheet. Its a bit more comlex than producing in an hour cause there are all these variables like Sponsor Servicing Allowances, Vehicle Allowances for those, Reduction from Contract monies for private health cover, no of games played last season, expected games next season, 10 year plus allowances etc. BUT having siad that it is a standard template provided by the NRL so it is a case of just adding and deleting players names from the spreadsheet.

Its just poor form either the CEO or Financial Controller hadnt been trained as a cap admistrator backup for Sarg.. but hey that'd be a SENSIBLE business practice - something non existant at the Knights.

Yeah its crazy cause unless we know exactly how much we have to spend.... we can do any buying. Corwe and Cheif were supposed to have revieweed it over the weekend.. but whats the rush.

And YES .. the CEO MUST Sign EVERY player contract or co sign it with Sarge so CONWAY should know exactly where we are.. not sure what role he does actually play in that place. It would appear UPGRADES have taken up most of our buying power. This is LUDICRUS to put in an UPGRADE componenet without a performance base. It was just a case of them living from hand to mouth. They buy the player cheap in Year1 then promise a huge increase in year two - just pushing the finanacial obligation back another year until eventually as it seem to in 2005 it comes back and bites u on the butt.

I notice the 4 x NRL Board Members have finally pulled a stunt to big note themselves by offering to lend the Knights money. The NRL (not the Newcastle one) had already promised to make good any shortfall - so the latest offer by the "REAL" NRL i.e the Joke one is just to sure up their positions on the Board in case Wests take over. I recakon we need a totally new Board.
 

macavity

Referee
Messages
21,104
Vanilla Dice said:
I think its time that some of the posters who continually knock the teams administration outed themsleves and their personal aspirations for office within the club

huh? I don't think that anyone here wants the CEO's job..... a few of us here would consider running for the board, however, if things dont right themselves by the time elections roll around. And what is wrong with that? As members we have the right and duty to do so. Are the current board selfish for having stood for their positions?

You seem to imply that people are trying to hold management accountable for the mess we are in for selfish reasons. That is downright offensive and one wonders what YOUR vested interest is in making suck an assertion.

Like any true supporter of our (once) great club, all we want from our admin is accountability, professionalism and best practice. If we feel that is not the case what is wrong with members being proactive and trying to make a positive difference? Are you saying that the guys that have had years to get it right and failed dismally are all of a sudden the right guys for the job? What changed? Hill leaving? Give me a break.

Noone outside of the official loop can understand the complexities of adjustments for long term injuries, the new sponsor allowances, the increase of base salary cap based on increased team sponsorship since 2001.

seems that those IN the 'official loop' are having alot of difficulty understanding it too. again, given the information that they have, im sure there are a number of people here that could work it out. We aren't idiots.

On top of all this there is the hangover from the Hill years with player payments backended to keep there short term view of the world.

the CEO and FOOTBALL MANAGER sign off on contracts. Hill has/had very little to do with it - he was chairman, not an executive officer. Sarge is gone, but what has the other guy responsible had to say about all this...?

I go on official announcments and media stories and since Hill has left I have seen

1. A new Sponsorship Manager
this is a good thing? Thurston was, by all accounts, a very effective operator.

2. A Managed Resignation of a football manger
while the skeletons that have spilled out of the closet don't paint him in the best light, lets not forget Sarge was PUSHED by the Chairman as he backed up his perversely close pal the CEO. There was no performance basis for his 'resignation' (perhaps in hindsight..) and it came at the worst possible time, just before the silly season. And this was 'managed'? I would hate to see an 'unplanned' resignation..... Im not going to go into who was right/wrong, but to say it was 'managed' is a joke.

3. A New Naming Rights Sponsor

That literally fell into their lap. C&A sees the Knights as a charity case, no question. This sponsorship was an attempt to be seen to be doing the right thing - the only value to C&A is good will - and it cannot be overlooked that the Knights admin did virtually NOTHING to land this one. Why hadn't they approached C&A themselves? Why did it take Costa to get it happening? What are they going to do when C&A pulls out? Back to square one. There is still no sustainable approach here.

4. Confirmation of deliberate and thoughtfull talks with wests
what happened to this 'report' coming back in 6 months time before they do anything? Makes a bit of a mockery of that approach to now be in 'deliberate and thoughtful' talks, doesn't it? If they werent actually going to wait for this 'report', then why couldn't these talks have happened 6 months ago? There is also still no where near a guarantee of any link there. I guess the real litmus test will come when terms are negotiated - it wouldnt suprise for Wests to request that certain administrators are replaced - when/if this comes, will they stand aside for the good of the club, or will they cling to power? Only time will tell.


..... and 13 losses.

6. An open statement on the position of the salary cap and the difficulties they face fitting new players under it

what? 'we are going to make you all offers, we need you, we want you, but we wont be competitive'......

I understand the need for tact, but there is also a need to be HONEST, not pussy foot around. Why has there been no mention of PERFORMANCE - our managers are too busy trying to be nice to be frank about this.

The fact that we have a wooden-spoon roster, and the inability to recruit as we are nearly full, speaks volumes. Sarge can take alot of blame for this, but who is the guy who oversees his performance.... he must also take the blame, and probably should take the fall as well.

7. Negotiation of the Real NRL to guarantee an overdraft should it be required

whoopty damn doo. They are a stakeholder with nearly half the board. This is no accomplishment.

And a general willingness to share information and transparency of operation that never took place in the old Power Tower days.

you are joking right? The only reason they are 'willing to share information' is because they are well and truly under the pump due to abysmal performance. Maybe the hard questions weren't asked back in the 'old days' because we were actually WINNING, have you thought of that?
The more things change....


We are all armchair experts who can say well I would have no sponsor problems and I would have x and I would buy y and I would have full time arsewipers for all the players. The bottom line is that there is a team of people who have to make decisions on the numbers they have and react to situations like Bathurst. There are always comprises and never utopian solultions

of course. but does this negate the need for accountability?

is it impossible that others could do the job better than the current guys?

I love my club and I am encouraged by the new direction that Tyler has seemingly bought to the organisation. Remember it was Tyler who brought Conway to the job in the first place. Maybe these guys were meant to work together.

how long has tyler been there? how long has he had the opportunity to bring this 'direction' the the club? He didnt just pop out of a space ship, he has been on the board for years. As for bringing in Conway, explain why his (Conway's reign) has coincided with our demise?

Too strong a coincidence to be disregarded....

So all you knockers put up or shut up. I personally tipped a 5 figure amount into the club this year so what have you done and what are you willing to do?

Good on you. I dont have the sort of cabbage available to do that, but certainly would if possible. Doesn't give you the right to talk in such a condescending manner to the rest of us though.

As for what we are doing, we are attempting to engage the administration constructively to help in any way possible. As mere 'little people' we aren't exactly empowered to do much else. We put up, and we will never shut up.

I suggest you PM me and actually learn what is going on before going on like this again.

Most posters here also love the club they live the dream and die the deaths with the players. We harbor no ambitions other than to see our guys do well, you few guys are abusing our passion for personal gain.

That is downright offensive and warrants an apology. You think we give up our time, go through this pain, for personal gain? What do we have to gain? Tell me that smart man. We love the club LESS because we are trying to help it be successful?? pull your head in.

Shame on you!

no, Shame on YOU.

how dare you cast these aspersions on anyone.
 
Messages
377
Vanilla Dice said:
I think its time that some of the posters who continually knock the teams administration outed themsleves and their personal aspirations for office within the club

I go on official announcments and media stories and since Hill has left I have seen

And a general willingness to share information and transparency of operation that never took place in the old Power Tower days.

I love my club and I am encouraged by the new direction that Tyler has seemingly bought to the organisation. Remember it was Tyler who brought Conway to the job in the first place. Maybe these guys were meant to work together.

Shame on you!
OK Vanilla Dice - How about we start with you. Out yourself then if you want others to do the ame.

I can comment on FACT and my own personal knowledge of the Salary Cap - Sure there are comlexities but they should have been managed properly and a safety net for Sarge's disappearence - particularly if you claim it was a "managed" i.e contrived resgination.

I note you have stated Remember it was Tyler who brought Conway to the job in the first place. You have outed yourself now as you stated I go on official announcments and media stories. I dont recall reading AN official announcement or media story that stated Tyler brought Conway to the Knights in April 2002.

Thats the one thing I DO have against Mike Tyler. Bringing a fool like COnway to the Knightws is why we are in this mess. Hill was involved for 15+ years it was the diabolical combination that Hill and Conway formed in the past thre years that led to our downfall.

Name me three posititve things (if you name ONE I'd be surpirsed) that Ken Conway has brought to the Knights in his 39 month reign of mediocrity. Through Tylers own words - it was Hill and Conway that allegdly kept Tyler and the rest of the Board in the dark over so many issues relating to financial position etc. I dont for one second beleive that. As you say Tyler and Conway are as thick as theives and Conway would have kept Tyler informed of every step. If he didnt he should be ditched. If he did Tyler is just buying more time to try and right the wrongs he has overseen in the same 3+ year period.

Part of what you have said is very good and correct. The transparency angle has been lifted greatly post Hill - only through media scrutiny to a large extent. You say we have had one win from 14 - One victory - hardly worth getting excited about but at least a giant monkey off the back.

OK lets look at Tyler and Conways achievements post Hill.

1. A new Sponsorship Manager - cause one resigned of his own accord.
2. A Managed Resignation of a football manger - So now we r in the
dark. Couldnt they have just managed the existing one? Thats right
Sarge and Ken had played no speakies since Jan 2003.
3. A New Naming Rights Sponsor - Thanks Michael Costa had to happen
eventually didnt it
4. Confirmation of deliberate and thoughtfull talks with wests- Media
pushed this along - Should have started 2 years ago
5. A win - WOW one form 14 - Well done Managment. It is good but!
6. An open statement on the position of the salary cap and the difficulties
they face fitting new players under it- Open statment saying we have
no money to spend as far as we know but really we have NFI
7. Negotiation of the Real NRL to guarantee an overdraft should it be required
- Yeah the NRL for ONCE in their 18 years are wanting to now LOOK LIKE
they really give a damn about the Knights. Now there is a risk to their 4
positions. Pffft - too little too late MATE

I dont know about YOU Vanilla dice who all of a sudden comes out for the Club - what are your intentions? You may go on media reports. I am not as gullable. I go on facts and my own personal experiences and knowldege of the people I am criticising. I just wish people had listened 3 years ago to the bleeding obvious.

Lets hope we get a totally new management team. Flush out the dead wood and inept managment of the past three years that got us in this fine mess. Ice Ice Baby! Out yourself Mr five figure donor. What were your 5 figures? $320.00 for a Season Ticket? Or did you buy a $12,000 corporate box - either way you get something in return. What do the rest of us get from your precious Managment you are quick to protect?
 
Messages
16,034
The Little People said:
What better quality centres do we have? A 19 year old? and Carmont... Pffft

Mate just because we dont have much - though Tigh's had 2 very good games, doesnt mean we buy any sh*t thats available.

Last thing we need is more deadwood.
 

antonius

Coach
Messages
10,103
Vanilla Dice said:
I think its time that some of the posters who continually knock the teams administration outed themsleves and their personal aspirations for office within the club

They have some data and none of that in context meaning they have NO REAL information. Noone outside of the official loop can understand the complexities of adjustments for long term injuries, the new sponsor allowances, the increase of base salary cap based on increased team sponsorship since 2001. On top of all this there is the hangover from the Hill years with player payments backended to keep there short term view of the world.

I go on official announcments and media stories and since Hill has left I have seen

1. A new Sponsorship Manager
2. A Managed Resignation of a football manger
3. A New Naming Rights Sponsor
4. Confirmation of deliberate and thoughtfull talks with wests
5. A win
6. An open statement on the position of the salary cap and the difficulties they face fitting new players under it
7. Negotiation of the Real NRL to guarantee an overdraft should it be required

And a general willingness to share information and transparency of operation that never took place in the old Power Tower days.

We are all armchair experts who can say well I would have no sponsor problems and I would have x and I would buy y and I would have full time arsewipers for all the players. The bottom line is that there is a team of people who have to make decisions on the numbers they have and react to situations like Bathurst. There are always comprises and never utopian solultions

I love my club and I am encouraged by the new direction that Tyler has seemingly bought to the organisation. Remember it was Tyler who brought Conway to the job in the first place. Maybe these guys were meant to work together.

So all you knockers put up or shut up. I personally tipped a 5 figure amount into the club this year so what have you done and what are you willing to do?

Most posters here also love the club they live the dream and die the deaths with the players. We harbor no ambitions other than to see our guys do well, you few guys are abusing our passion for personal gain.

Shame on you!

Testy sort of post there. Lets look at your points one by one. Let me say first up that you are very fortunate to be able able to afford to "Tip in a five figure sponsorship" Obviously not one of us "Little People" As Pringle likes to refer to us as. Most of the people on here measure their love for the club in turning up for games and spending their hard earned on tickets, clothing etc. In the context that the majority are ordinary working people or schoolkids, I see that support every bit as valuable as your Five figure sum.
  1. New Sponsorship manager. I don’t see that as an achievement by this board, they simply replaced the old one. What's the new guys name again, is he in charge of all those balls Tyler still has in the air?
  2. I would say the Football manager was obliged to leave because he had an unworkable situation with the CEO, he stated some facts, which everyone was aware of, and paid the price. Others did the same (Andrew Johns) and suffered no such critism.
  3. A naming rights sponsor, well done Michael Costa.
  4. After much public pressure they decided to talk, after initially trying to fob supporters off with a committee formation.
  5. This really is a classic A WIN!!!! Wow, no mention of the losses there I see, that's an achievement on its own.
  6. Yes they are in a bind aren’t they, who’s fault is that? This board have been over seeing the workings of the club a lot longer than a few months, they are to blame along with the CEO. That’s where the buck stops.
  7. What’s new? we negotiate a loan every year.
I don’t think anyone has ulterior motives for being annoyed at the fall of our club (and it is our club) not yours, or the boards, it belongs to all of us. We are entitled to voice an opinion. If you’re happy with what’s being done with your Five figure sum then so be it. We are not happy with what’s being done with our gate takings, our membership fees, and our sponsorship dollars (from merchandise sales) I am also at a loss as to what the "personal gain" is you refer to. Your post is an insult to the ordinary loyal fan. As for us outing ourselves, who are you? Steve Crowe, Ken Conway?



 

Nuffy

Bench
Messages
4,075
I won't continue the hiding of old VD as hes been slapped enough and its obvious that he has a vested interested in boosting the clubs management, draw any conclusion you like, I have my suspicions!

It seems however that VD didn't really think before he spoke, much of what he claims as progress is actually maintaining the status quo, and as for claiming a win as an achievement........don't get me f**king started!!!!!

There is very little about that club that is materially different than its been for the last few years, there is no new broom, just the same faces dressing themselves up as change agents, with the exception of Hill and Sarge, its the same team thats presided over the declining performance of the team and club.

I will however take exception at the belief that we are in this for personal gain, you have got to be kidding, we are the stupid mugs that pay each and every game for the pleasure of watching our team get beaten..................the staff and admin actually get paid FOR THEIR INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CLUB, we the supporters PAY FOR OURS!!

I will say however that there will be a groundswell of support for change at the board level next year UNLESS there is exponential improvement in every aspect of the club, and I'd suggest that the current board will be at a distinct disadvantage based on the performance of the club and team thus far this year...........don't kid yourselve VD, 2005 is going to stick in the minds of the supporters for a long time and Tyler and his board will carry that legacy into next years elections, its up to them whether they have some good news to offer the supporters, or whether we'll still be long on promises and short on actions.

Our only interest as supporters is to see our club return to the top of the NRL, to suggest other sinister motives is not only wrong, it is insulting. We do however, expect the club to display professionalism, proactivity and a performance based culture. To this point, 2005 has shown none of those traits within our club.

I am however happy to support sponsors that support my club, so you indicated that you tipped a 5 figure amount into the club, I assume you are a sponsor, so let us know the name of your organisation so that we can support you!!
 

Doctor

Bench
Messages
3,612
antonius said:
Your post is an insult to the ordinary loyal fan. As for us outing ourselves, who are you? Steve Crowe, Ken Conway?

Yes, I was about to say "is that you Ken?". :lol:

I think enough has been said about the post made by Vanilla Dice. We do tend to criticise the administration, but it doesn't have anything to do with wanting their jobs. It's because of a poor performance on their part.

It's all balanced with the need for the players to improve, the coach to improve and the fans to continue to be loyal to a team that is trying its best.
 
Messages
377
Oswin said:
Yes, I was about to say "is that you Ken?". :lol:

I think enough has been said about the post made by Vanilla Dice. We do tend to criticise the administration, but it doesn't have anything to do with wanting their jobs. It's because of a poor performance on their part.

It's all balanced with the need for the players to improve, the coach to improve and the fans to continue to be loyal to a team that is trying its best.

Yes Vanilla Dice is correct - We tend to criticise Managment too much. I think we should start criticising Vanilla Dice's post - maybe break down each of his comments and analyse how stupid the poor guy must be feeling now trying to defend Conway and making one of Tylers claims to fame being employing Conway. That to me has been one of Tylers only (albeit) biggest mistakes.

What say you Vanilla Dice given we are 15 hours out from the Free For All before our future stars are given away to other clubs?

Mut and The Little People think Vanilla Dice wont be able to back up his claims. I'm still waiting for Vanilla Dice to advise me what THREE Positive contributions Conway has made to the Knights during his rein of ineptitude?
 
Messages
377
Come on VD (Vanilla Dice) even ONE contribution he has made would be good.

Aah well less than 6 hours till the deadline and the likes of St George and The Roosters start picking up some of our future talent that we didnt manage to sign up. :-(

Or is Steve Crowe still trying to add up the top 25 players contracts and deduct the sum from $3.25M to work out how muh we have to spend?

Vanilla Dice - Couldnt the greatly MANAGED RESIGNATION of Sargent have been managed to be done AFTER July 1st? or maybe even 2 years ago when Conway stopped talking to Sarge and before the UOPGRADE contracts signed off by Conway and Sargent
 
Top