hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,770
Yep, and Starc doesn't look quite 100% either. why risk him breaking down??? Latham looking 1m dollars here.It's just unnecessary work for the bowlers
Yep, and Starc doesn't look quite 100% either. why risk him breaking down??? Latham looking 1m dollars here.It's just unnecessary work for the bowlers
Raining at my work which about a 5 minute walk from the WACA
Geez there are some plodders on the ABC. All three in the lunch break show agreed Australia had less to lose by pushing for a win than NZ, and one thought going to Adelaide 1-0 would be more of a risk than going 1-1 :?
I think for the first time in a while (perhaps my lifetime) I would prefer to listen to CH9 (if only be default).
Looks like it is pissing down now, they reckon not much is on radar so who knows.
Are you the curator of this flat pitch
ABC radio has generally be fine. Jim and Waddle are good, Katich and Nannes have generally be good. Whateley is a bit grating and I don't like Terry Alderman all that much, but Chris Rogers was excellent in Brisbane. Still a much better broadcast than Nein.
Not sure why he bothers listening to those gimps on channel 9, it's like they talked him into a declaration.
Channel 9 got exactly what they wanted so no surprise there was a declaration. Got to justify showing the cricket at 7pm through to 9pm on a Tuesday night in November.
:lol:?Steve, the cameras are on you now. Can you hear us? (*Steve nods his head*). Ok, Steve, we need you to declare now, so we can go straight to the Channel 9 newsroom and take on the bastards at Channel 7"
On a more serious note, remember that ODI at the WACA last year vs South Africa where the dinner break was 1 hour (instead of 45 minutes) so that Ch9 were able to start the 2nd innings right after the news at 6:30pm?
The Kookaburra people all need to be sacked,someone sack the people of Kookaburra,f**king joke