could be a bit of that, but he's pretty good in every innings tbhis that related to NZ conditions - generally batting gets easier there?
is that related to NZ conditions - generally batting gets easier there?
is that related to NZ conditions - generally batting gets easier there?
could be a bit of that, but he's pretty good in every innings tbh
What's suprising is that being unable to play as many tests as the other three, he's got as many centuries as any of them, and has batted so many times in the 4th innings - partly because we're grafters rather than big dogs, I guess
Convincing 7 wicket win, O'Rourke given MoM, I still think Williamson should have got it, but he won't care... shame he doesn't have a Davey leap, he looks almost apologetic or embarrassed when he gets 100...
Wouldn't swap him for anyone atm, clearly the best atm imo, obviously Smith and Kohli have been down on form a bit, and Root engaging in self-harm by trying to play T20 in tests
Overall probably, but still things to happen and he doesn’t get as many opportunities as they do.. and his away record isn’t Warner level of plod to be fairA bit of David Warner in Kane, ie great home town boy average 70.00
Not that good in England nor India, miserable in South Africa and SL, Respectable in Australia
Still a great kiwi batsman, and top 4 of this era for sure, but Smith / Kholi have him covered...overall IMO
It's amazing that Australia's hero Bairstow, who's been in and out of the English team, has played 1 fewer test that Williamson....If NZ played the same amount of tests as what England do.
Kane would have given Sachin's test 100s record a shake.
Well I think read that NZC were the ones that decided it was going to be a 2 test series against Australia as financially it's better for them.It's amazing that Australia's hero Bairstow, who's been in and out of the English team, has played 1 fewer test that Williamson....
I'm not sure who's decision it was, but yeah agree 100% - but at the end of the day, at least we're not prioritising our domestic T20 comp to pay the bills - and even the upcoming T20 series won't feature several of our best players for various reasons.Well I think read that NZC were the ones that decided it was going to be a 2 test series against Australia as financially it's better for them.
I get it I suppose test cricket isn't cheap for smaller nations but still I think 3 test series should be played instead of 2.
Especially against Australia like 2005 was the last time we played a 3 test series in NZ. For me that's a bit ridiculous. 2 tests is too light on.
How many home series do NZ have that are 3 tests anymore is there any???
Which doesn't help Kane's case to play more test cricket.