3-2-1 v Knights

[ozenzud]

Other than those critical kicks, Boyd's general kicking was really good. Man, he was getting some distance. If the game plan was to kick to the corners and play for field position (which I think it was), he did his bit. But CHT went completely missing in attack and it was pretty much all Boyd. They need to work on the combination. CHT and Boyd had good defensive games. DWZ........far out......

3. Leka
2. Clark
1. Vaimauga

 

[Rich102]

3. Halasima
2. Egan
1. Vaimauga

 

[Rich102]

Oh, I forgot.
FO Dallin.

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

3. RTS - in pretty vintage form
2. Leka - 2 huge plays
1. Vaimauga

HM: Taine, Voss kept mentioning how quiet he was on attack, but he made some great defensive plays. Clark and Egan were strong as usual and unlucky to miss points.

DM: DWZ, Capewell, Boyd (Boyd for his kicking late on, but this 3 were all part of a dysfunctional defensive edge).

 

[JJ]

3. RTS - in pretty vintage form

He is... and given that should a move to 1 be considered? I wonder if we had some wings whether that might happen - but great to see

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

He is... and given that should a move to 1 be considered? I wonder if we had some wings whether that might happen - but great to see

I think given the options we have at fullback it makes sense to keep him on the wing. Currently he is clearly our best winger, while TT and CNK are each in their own way very good fullbacks imo.

 

[Blair]

3. Halasima
2. Roger
1. Egan

 

[Meth]

But CHT went completely missing in attack and it was pretty much all Boyd.

This has been said all year and I think it's unfair. First of all because Harris Tavita has been doing some great work on both sides of the ball. Secondly, because it's quite obviously a Webster thing, not a CHT thing.