Maybe this was a bit cryptic. I was not bagging Johnson. He had a solid game in conditions that didn't suit him.
I was more questioning where is fits into Ivan's picture.
Seymour's contract hasn't, at this time, been extended. Does this mean he won't be signed? I have been a critic of his, I think he is very slow for a half, but I can see why Ivan likes him. His defence is good, his kicking is solid, he doesn't make many mistakes and his combination with maloney is good.
So was Johnson coming in for an injured Seymour as a long-awaited trial or is this an indication of the future?
I have seen a fair bit of Shaun with the U20's over the last couple ofyears. Coming to League from touch rugby he has had a fairly steep learning curve. He played well in last year's U20 grand final, though Carlos took the player- of- the- day. But his form over the year was a bit hit and miss. He excels in broken field play, a legacy of his touch days, but fails to shine in the tight. His kicking game can be brilliant but can also be dreadful.
So how will he go in the NRL?
It is worth remembering that for most of his U20's career he was behind a dominant pack. Apparently he has gone well for the Vulcans, but again behind a dominant pack.
Now my question is has he leapfrogged over John and Godinet? I thought
john looked really solid before his injury and linked well with Maloney. The glimpse of Godinet I saw in the Greymouth trial I really liked the way he linked with Fish. Sadly there is no TV coverage of the Vulcans.
OK. So is Johnson going to be given a shot until Seymour comes back or will Ivan play it safe?
The Warrior's have brought Johnson along slowly; rightly so. I am not convinced, on Saturday's showing, he is ready for first grade. But I am prepared to see him given a chance.
However I would hate to lose John & Godinet just because they are held back.