Agree. Very tough to keep for 50 overs then bat at 3.
Handscombe's technique is an interesting one but could get him into trouble in places like NZ and England that don't have the fast and hard bounce of Australia. Dangerous playing so deep in NZ conditions.
Faulkners batting has been terrible for a while now, great idea to go in with the extra bowler.
Well derped selectors.
I don't really see him as a batsman, he's a great lower order hitter but you wouldn't want him batting anymore than 15 overs IMO. With Handscum taking the gloves and the side full of all rounders in the top 6 another batsman should of been in the side somewhere.Use him as a tail ender, we can't wonder why he doesn't bat like a batsman tbh. Good nut and a good catch...whether it's our coaches or captain, someone doesn't rate him enough to bat him where he should be...
I don't really see him as a batsman, he's a great lower order hitter but you wouldn't want him batting anymore than 15 overs IMO. With Handscum taking the gloves and the side full of all rounders in the top 6 another batsman should of been in the side somewhere.
Faulkner is fine at 7 if the top order is full of all rounders or Marshes.Yeah I agree with that. I wouldn't have taken Stoinis. Obviously he's justified his selection but on balance Faulkner is a better bowler and has been a better batsman.
I just think he needs to bat higher than 8. He's pretty good and he actually needs time to get in...unlike Maxwell who can tonk from ball one. I'd have them swapped in the order.
Baz your boy Stonis looking good again mate![]()
How'd you go yesterday mate???If only my bagging actually affected players, I'd bag myself and score millions
How'd you go yesterday mate???