What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

3rd Test: Australia v India at Perth Jan 13-17, 2012

beads6

First Grade
Messages
6,162
Sucks we have to wait so long for Warner to tee off again. Glad I am not playing cricket today.
 

aussies1st

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,154
WACA track is no green monster

ON a pitch much better for batting than many people expected, the Australians have India by the scruff of the neck. They put the opposition in, got them out cheaply and then scored at almost eight runs an over with the new ball, which I think is the key moment of a game in any form of cricket, but especially with the Kookaburra ball.

India's poor form in the series continues. Once again the Indians were dismissed for fewer than 200 and if a team keeps doing that in the first innings of a Test it ends up the losing side more times than not.

There was a lot of talk before the Test about how quick the wicket would be, the curator announcing that he had managed to get the pace back on the WACA Ground, and that it would be like the pitch of old.
Advertisement: Story continues below

I had a lot of doubt about his remarks. It has been a good batting surface and, to be honest, the pitch at Melbourne had a lot more help for the bowlers than this one.

I feel both the captains read the pitch wrongly. There is still a lot of grass cover and they expected the ball to do a lot more than actually occurred. That both captains picked four fast bowlers was a perfect example of what they felt about the pitch.

I was surprised with India's decision to field four quicks and I honestly felt Pragyan Ojha would have been a good choice. The Australians have not played left-arm spin well over the years and India should have had the variation in their attack. On the other hand, for Australia it was a good choice. Nathan Lyon has not been effective in the series and, if I were Michael Clarke, I would play four quicks in Adelaide as well.

The first session of a Test match is so important to the outcome of a game and India faltered again in the last 15 minutes of it. The loss of Sachin Tendulkar and a comfortable-looking Gautan Gambhir in the space of six runs put just too much pressure on the Indians.

Rahul Dravid struggled once again. His form has dipped hugely after the first hour in Melbourne, where he looked at ease. That the ball hit the timber again could add to his worries. There has been a massive change in his initial movement and I don't know whether it's a conscious one.

In the past, he has moved back and across to the quicks at the time of delivery, which got him into good positions, but having looked at the footage over and over again, his back foot is hovering on leg stump with no sharp movement back and he keeps looking hurried at the crease.

It would be good if he spent some time with the television crew and gets it sorted as he still has three more innings to play on this tour.

In the Australian innings, David Warner, who had been having problems with Zaheer Khan, came out with an intent and it was a brave decision. He has earned a reputation for being such a good Twenty20 player and he decided to stick to that game.

It is a terrific batting surface here, probably the best in the series, and the Australians are already close to the Indian total.

For the Indian batting, the worries continue. It's really hard for me to find a reason why such a talented line-up keeps getting bowled out cheaply. It's been another soft performance against pace and if the knives are out now, they have to blame themselves.

They have looked completely out of sorts and it's hard to fathom what needs to be done to get that confidence back in the ranks.

The Indians have scored runs against better attacks all around the world, but it just seems to have gone haywire at this stage and, as a teammate to a lot of these players, I can't find a way to set it right.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/waca-track-is-no-green-monster-20120113-1pzrm.html#ixzz1jNTbq5SN

Read the pitch wrongly? Maybe India did but we bowled India out for 161 with each seamer getting a fair share of overs and wickets between them. Batting paradise? The ball was moving about when Starc ended the Indian innings and Zaheer bowled a few jaffers to Warner earlier on. I guess that is why they call Indian pitches roads as there is no other word to describe a proper flat pitch if this is being called a batting paradise.
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
Where can I watch the press conference?


:? I thought he looked very solid and comfortable.

He defend very well and put shit balls away very nicely and also looked to give Warner the strike as much as possible.

I was particularly impressed with the roll of the wrists which turned a forward defensive shot in to a boundary through square leg.

Usman Khawaja a better option, maybe. Who else? Marsh? Hughes? Nope.

He also knicked one to the slips that dropped short and was caught off his gloves and not given. He just doesn't look comfortable to me and I don't see him as a long term opener.
 

Chip Bayless

Juniors
Messages
655
India's away record is a window in to the current plight of this Indian team as well as those from yesteryear.
 
Last edited:

coolumsharkie

Referee
Messages
27,115
He also knicked one to the slips that dropped short and was caught off his gloves and not given. He just doesn't look comfortable to me and I don't see him as a long term opener.

I have to agree with you here, although yesterday was his best knock but he needs to improve alot to keep it his own. Maybe he might be the type of player that grows with more experience/confidence.
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
I have to agree with you here, although yesterday was his best knock but he needs to improve alot to keep it his own. Maybe he might be the type of player that grows with more experience/confidence.

I don't know that he will, he just doesn't seem quite up to it. He's ok but I just don't see him as our permanent test opener.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
69,190
We will bat all day today, no question. Warner triple ton

Probably declare at drinks break after lunch tomorrow Day 3 - dejavu (half way mark of test as in Sydney)

Cheers

PS What are the odds of us winning 3 tests vs India by an innings, the reverse of last year, pretty weird stuff
 

aussies1st

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,154
Would be a crackup if we are in the same position as the SCG test wondering if a player will break the WR.
 

Spot On

Coach
Messages
13,902
Don't know about you blokes but I loved the attitude both openers showed yesterday. They were on a mission and it all came together. They thrive on the banter and give as good as they get - maybe better. Hope they keep these two together for a while. The celebration between them both at Warner's hundred was emotion packed stuff.
 

JW

Coach
Messages
12,657
Don't know about you blokes but I loved the attitude both openers showed yesterday. They were on a mission and it all came together. They thrive on the banter and give as good as they get - maybe better. Hope they keep these two together for a while. The celebration between them both at Warner's hundred was emotion packed stuff.

Agreed. And it was far, far more exciting and meaningful to see Warner produce that type of innings in the Test arena as opposed to the Kentucky Fried format.
 

snoozer

Bench
Messages
4,491
He also knicked one to the slips that dropped short and was caught off his gloves and not given. He just doesn't look comfortable to me and I don't see him as a long term opener.
so what.

cricket involves luck.he got some.he was dudded in the 1st test in his 60's.

he doesn't look comfortable to you?write a letter to the selectors.i'm sure they, like me, couldn't give a f**k what you think.
 

Latest posts

Top