What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

3rd Test: India v Australia at Mohali (Punjab) Mar 14-18, 2013

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
Only change should be Lyon in for Maxwell.

Maybe a Shitchell (either one) in for Siddle if he's buggered.
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
Changes changes changes

Out Maxwell
Hughes

I would also like to exclude an underachieving/ mediocre Shane Watson, as good an ODI player he is (ie smashing centuries v Bangladesh and the West Indies), hes not cut out for Test match cricket. But hes got tenure

In

Lyon
O'Keefe - he can bat as well
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
If its any consolation, Australia can payback India and their batters when they come downunder

In payback for India having men around company around the bat with spitting cobras coming out on the 7th day pitch and bat pads diving left right and centre for anything coming their way.

Australia can bowl the ball short on their heads on our pitches
 

Sphagnum

Coach
Messages
13,128
A few changes for the next test

Cowan
Warner
Khuwaja
Clarke
Henriques
Smith
Haddin
O'Keefe
Johnson
Pattinson
Lyon
12th Man (starc)

I include Smith because he uses his feet and will play his natural game. Johnson can bat so he gets in as he will always get more runs and wickets than derp show. Wade is a hopeless merkin. Haddin needs to get the SOS now. 2 spinners, a part time spinner and 2 quicks + a medium pacer. More, better bowlers and a better batting lineup.
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
A few changes for the next test

Cowan
Warner
Khuwaja
Clarke
Henriques
Smith
Haddin
O'Keefe
Johnson
Pattinson
Lyon
12th Man (starc)

More likely
Cowan
Warner
Watson - LAST FKING CHANCE, SON!
??
Clarke
Henriques
Wade
Pattinson
Siddle
Lyon
Doherty

And Clarke is not going to go up to 4. Hes too stubborn. and psychologically he cant bat at 4, its like telling Hussey to bat at 4, or Open, hes not going to do it
 
Last edited:

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,203
Hughes out, Oozie in is a given

Johnson will add nothing, they will probably pick No Show again because he mopped up the tail

X will be out, Lyon will come in and probably rotate one of the quicks for Starc
 

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
51,463
For what it's worth and from the 16 available for selection. Unfortunately the squads makeup doesn't allow the likes of Watson, Hughes and Wade to be dumped.
Warner
Cowan
Hughes
Khawaja
Clarke
Henriques
Wade
Johnson*
Pattinson
Lyon
Doherty**

*Even though I hate Notch with a passion maybe he could pull that 1/120000 game out of his arse and have a blinder. Maybe he could break a few fingers and get the Indian batsmen hopping. He's worth a punt over Siddle.

** He's the lesser of two evils. Two real slow bowlers must play, not one slow bowler and f**king dipshit maxwell.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
Hughes out, Oozie in is a given

Johnson will add nothing, they will probably pick No Show again because he mopped up the tail

X will be out, Lyon will come in and probably rotate one of the quicks for Starc
Most of your post is full of wrong but this is the wrongest of your many wrongs. Why exactly would Lyon come in for X? They're not about to drop X when he outperformed the person he replaced.

Also, Hughes will play both of these tests and he will be on the plane to England.
 

Red Bear

Referee
Messages
20,882
We have massive problems at numbers 3 and four. In the south african series there was about 75 runs scored between those two in the batting lineup (Quiney, twatto, Punter). In the 8 tests since the start of the year (12 innings) there have been only four half centuries by players in those positions (two 80's from Hughes in Sydney/Hobart, 80 odd from tWatto in Melbourne, a half century from Clarke in Sydney when he had one match at four). Our opening stands have been passable and Clarke (and when he was playing, Hussey) have been pulling it back but we've been disgraceful between three and four and it is killing us at present.

Clarke must bat four at least, probably three, in the next test match. I know he prefers and is better at five but f**k it, he's our only batsmen of high quality and he's needed up the top. It'll help both Warner/Cowan as well tbh.

Oh and isnt Watsons kid due, so he may miss?

And will we get a replacement for Bird?
 

beads6

First Grade
Messages
6,162
I'd go with

Warner
Cowan
Khawaja
Clarke
Smith
Wade
Henriques
Siddle
Starc/Johnson
Lyon
Doherty
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
No he didn't.
Equal maybe, outperformed absolutely not.
Conceding significantly less runs at a significantly lower rate. Took wickets at a better average. And two batsmen that were fully in command and set could not get after him the way they did after Lyon. He took the same amount of wickets while being much less expensive. 15 maidens to 1.

And the above happened with 2 significant factors favouring Lyon and against X. Lyon bowled on a far more spin friendly pitch and Lyon had a much bigger amount of runs to defend.

Yes as you say they were equals, in terms of wickets. But in terms of every other measure, X was better.

Lyon should come in for Maxwell. But there is no way he is coming in for Doherty.
 

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
51,463
If Watson goes home for his kids birth then he can stay at home. Obviously this wanker is not professional enough to focus on cricket and doesn't deserve the reward of going home.

Sounds harsh but f**k him.
 

beads6

First Grade
Messages
6,162
If Watson goes home for his kids birth then he can stay at home. Obviously this wanker is not professional enough to focus on cricket and doesn't deserve the reward of going home.

Sounds harsh but f**k him.

This is pretty pathetic from you TBH. All cricketers should be able to go home for the birth of their child. It is only cricket. He should't be in the team anyway.
 

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
51,463
This is pretty pathetic from you TBH. All cricketers should be able to go home for the birth of their child. It is only cricket. He should't be in the team anyway.

If Watson was a professional team player who put in every test instead of a weak selfish pussy then I'd have no problem with him going home. I'm happy for him to go home now but he should stay there. He's a waste of space and surplus to requirements in the test side.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,024
If Watson goes home for his kids birth then he can stay at home. Obviously this wanker is not professional enough to focus on cricket and doesn't deserve the reward of going home.

Sounds harsh but f**k him.


It wouldn't be anywhere near the biggest scumbag move the selectors have made, considering they dropped Haddin from the side after he made a mercy dash home to be with his kid who just got diagnosed with cancer
 

Red&BlackBear

First Grade
Messages
5,603
Tough to say but I'd have

Warner
Cowan or Hughes
Khawaja
Clarke
Watson
Henriques
Wade
Pattinson
Johnson
Lyon
Doherty

Patto/Notch can bowl 50 overs between them.
Henriques can bowl 20-25.
Doherty/Lyon 80 overs.
Clarke 5.
Khawaja 3.

Depends how much carnage the Indian batsmen do though of course.. Could well be bowling more!
 

Horrie Is God

First Grade
Messages
8,073
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/replacements-needed-but-the-cupboard-is-bare-20130305-2fiw5.html

Replacements needed but the cupboard is bare..

Date March 5, 2013 - 9:40PM Chris Barrett Sports Writer

HYDERABAD: Humiliating. That is the only word for it. Australia's abject campaign in India was already a throwback to the dark ages of the 1980s, when Allan Border's men were lucky to beat a backyard side.

Now it is at rock bottom, and so are they.

Australia had turned up in south India a month ago, in dribs and drabs, on a reconnaissance mission to learn or gain a revision on the challenges that would confront them on the subcontinent.

They had turned up as much with hope as confident ambition that they could be only Australia's second touring party to win here in 40 years. India, after all, were ranked fifth in the world, had just been humbled at home by England and were supposedly there for the taking.

This was meant to be the launching pad for the main event of the cricket calendar – the quest for the Ashes in the English summer, and then the re-match in Australia later in the year.

Instead, they have crashed and burned and have to scramble to pick up what pieces are left. Losing in India is not a crime, but losing like this is.

A defeat of monumental proportions in the second Test, by an innings and 135 runs, leaves them in crisis, worse than the 47 in Cape Town and losing to New Zealand in Hobart.

Australia's batsmen exited with such frequency at the Rajiv Gandhi Stadium on Tuesday morning that it was as if they had somewhere else to be.

Victory, after the events of the preceding three days, was always going to be a long shot. Even saving the match was at distant odds. But the way in which they were felled, losing 8-57 before lunch, was embarrassing.

The fingers can be pointed at the selectors, at the bowling attack, at a lack of top-class spinners, but the villains here have been the batsmen.

Michael Clarke aside the top order has been abysmal. Combating the spin lobbed at them on dusty pitches by the Indian tricksters was always going to be a major issue. But inexperience in such conditions isn't an excuse for what has been served up in Hyderabad.

Patience and respect for their wickets seemed to be totally absent, and shot selection was awful. Too many have been fooled playing across the line and against the spin.

Clarke, the one batsman who has been a match for India, has already indicated that enough is enough and he will move up the order, probably to No.4.

Whether that is any help is anyone's guess. Shane Watson and Phil Hughes, for starters, are lucky to be even holding their places. The problem is that there is basically no one else to come in.

This could be the lot we're stuck with.
 

Latest posts

Top