What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

9th Immortal

Messages
3,884
Rosenfeld was pre WWII so he can't even be chosen under the criteria.

The non recognition of Brian Bevan occurs because he played in England. There is no criteria around this. Still won't happen but experts like Mascord and Harry Edgar would (correctly) agree he should be recognised.

Brian Bevan played for Eastern Suburbs before he went to England.

Incidentally, Albert Rosenfeld also played for Eastern Suburbs before he went to England.
 
Messages
3,884
Once again for the geniused.

There IS a Rugby League Hall of Fame.

Yes, and the Hall of Fame is where Norm Provan belongs. He was a good second rower, nothing more. Both Albert Rosenfeld and Brian Bevan were more distinguished than just being Hall of Famers. They each hold records (Rosenfeld number of tries in one season, Bevan number of tries in a career) that have never been equaled and probably never will..
 

blaza88z

Coach
Messages
15,186
Yes, and the Hall of Fame is where Norm Provan belongs. He was a good second rower, nothing more. Both Albert Rosenfeld and Brian Bevan were more distinguished than just being Hall of Famers. They each hold records (Rosenfeld number of tries in one season, Bevan number of tries in a career) that have never been equaled and probably never will..

You need to be more subtle
 

ed-grimley

Bench
Messages
2,552
Yes, and the Hall of Fame is where Norm Provan belongs. He was a good second rower, nothing more. Both Albert Rosenfeld and Brian Bevan were more distinguished than just being Hall of Famers. They each hold records (Rosenfeld number of tries in one season, Bevan number of tries in a career) that have never been equaled and probably never will..
You might be thinking of Peter Provan.
 

ed-grimley

Bench
Messages
2,552
Once again for the geniused.

There IS a Rugby League Hall of Fame.
And so there should be - to recognise the players who achieve at a high level in the game.
However, the Immortal concept is a huge wank. Because it is fairly new the game hasn't been able to recognise the stars of the past. Are Smith, Thurston and Lockyer (for instance) definitely better than any player from the 1960's back? There's no real way of telling.
The game should just put the concept into the "it seemed like a good idea at the time" category and let it sink in the mud of time.
 
Top