meltiger
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,268
CyberKev said:Criticism of Richmond
Which was all amazingly dealt out by Hawthorn fans.................
CyberKev said:Criticism of Richmond
CyberKev said:meltiger said:Richmond aren't offering two first up's for Simmonds though and in reality could instruct him to Nominate for the PSD.
I am a little concerned about the agreed salary @300k a year but in all honesty if you look at his stats in years previous to this he could genuinely be our #1 ruckmen until a kid comes through.
Thompson I am a big fan of but am leaning in the same direction as you, both player and club would probably benefit from a divorce.
If Richmond does pick up two firsties out of Ottens including one of Collingwoods #7 or Nth Melbourne's #10, do you still think the 5 year contract to Wallace was a bad idea? I am strongly leaning towards it being a brilliant move especially now given they can legimately argue they are rebuilding the list.
I'm leaning more and more toward Collingwood nailing Ottens through the PSD, although Richmond still has a couple of days to get a deal through. I wouldn't rule out Hawthorn as a surprise new suitor for Ottens through the PSD if a deal doesn't get up, however, given that money will be freed-up through Thompson's departure, the impending move of Lekkas and the possible trading of high money maker, Joel Smith.
CyberKev said:I was stunned to read that St Kilda is making a play for Lance Whitnall. I was very keen on getting Lance to Hawthorn, particularly as I felt we could get him without having to give up anything astronomical. He's always had weight worries, but he has good smarts and given the lack of creativity inherent in our dismal forward structure, I thought he would be great to slot in at CHF while we groom tall youngsters at Box Hill.
CyberKev said:Simmonds is now certain of going to Richmond, although time is running short for an adequate deal to be cut with Fremantle. He says he'll join them through the PSD if needed, which would put Richmond in an
interesting position if deals could not be done for he and Ottens prior to 2pm on Friday. Simmonds is not a sensational ruckman, but he is rock solid and doesn't (like many other players in the position) carry major injury queries. Put it this way, if I were a Tiger fan I'd be a lot more comfortable with paying $300k for him than I would have been with Miller's crazy notion of parting with $400k a year for Dean Solomon.
meltiger said:CyberKev said:Criticism of Richmond
Which was all amazingly dealt out by Hawthorn fans.................
meltiger said:Number 10 is now obviously gone but if they cannot get the deal through with a top 10'er expect one of Melbourne's 12/13 to play a part. He will not end up at McGuireville, I can gaurentee you that.
meltiger said:Whitnall is truely crap. Take it as a win for the Hawks if he ends up at St Kilda mate. He is a dud and a half.
meltiger said:I am pretty happy don't get me wrong. Just a bit itchy about getting the trade done before we have to choose between him and Brad in the PSD.
Johnny the Red said:Then there was the trading of Jolly to Sydney for pick 15!! I couldn't believe it... what a steal!!
The key to the yet-to-be ratified deal was Melbourne obtaining
Geelong's young midfielder Brent Moloney while Carlton arranged to
swap first- and second-round draft picks, giving the Tigers the
critical pick inside the draft's top 10 that they made an
unconditional part of any Ottens trade
meltiger said:We ended up with 12 & 16 for Ottens
meltiger said:Johnny the Red said:Then there was the trading of Jolly to Sydney for pick 15!! I couldn't believe it... what a steal!!
Definately picked up a great deal here the Dees, no need to Jolly and Sydney desperate for a ruckman = A sensational trade.
CyberKev said:On the downside, I really, really had my hopes up about offloading Angelo Lekkas to Carlton
meltiger said:CyberKev said:On the downside, I really, really had my hopes up about offloading Angelo Lekkas to Carlton
:lol:
Twas only 12 months ago you were defending the pretty boy against my many attacks ;-)
meltiger said::lol:
Mate the Hawks ended with ... 2,5,7,21 - I'm missing one?!
CyberKev said:meltiger said::lol:
Mate the Hawks ended with ... 2,5,7,21 - I'm missing one?!
No, that's it, with 26 also likely to snare a capable type.
CyberKev said:Besides, you are always attacking every Hawthorn player (past, present & future) in your frequent anti-Hawk tirades, so it stands to reason that inevitably we will fall into synch in our views on somebody.
meltiger said:CyberKev said:meltiger said::lol:
Mate the Hawks ended with ... 2,5,7,21 - I'm missing one?!
No, that's it, with 26 also likely to snare a capable type.
Two first round picks for Thompson though?!