Alan Jones on Easts 1975 GF Score

[God-King Dean]

:lol:

So Rooster fans agree with Fitzgerald, that goal kicking should be scrapped ?

 

[Roosterphin1]

:lol:

So Rooster fans agree with Fitzgerald, that goal kicking should be scrapped ?

What a dismal comeback:roll:

 

[Tonearm Terrorwrist]

:lol:

So Rooster fans agree with Fitzgerald, that goal kicking should be scrapped ?

imo ALL games should be played at night ... we're just creating a generation of skin cancer victims in both the crowd and players of day games :crazy:

 

[God-King Dean]

What a dismal comeback:roll:

You got me at :roll:

 

[TheDalek079]

38-0 was great, but it is no longer the record, even if in today's game they would have scored more than Manly did. We can still annoy dragons fans about it, but cannot claim it as a record.

 

[Geohood]

We'll just recreate history next year by thumping whoever we vs in the GF by 50. ;-)

 

[Jimmy]

Officially you're a twat.

And what are your credentials ? I will resist trading insults.

 

[adamkungl]

Gaba seems truly upset

 

[Cockadoodledoo]

Yes because you cant say what the score would have been under the current points system , because its different

Math's obviously not a strong point.. The 38 points was scored through 8 tries (then worth 3 points) and 7 conversions (no penalty goals), so it really is not hard to work out..

 

[Cockadoodledoo]

the current cricket points has change you get the no ball plus the runs you score off it

so a 6 could be worth 7 and a 4 could be with 5 under the current cricket points system , we are talking about the team score , shouldnt have mention bradman bad example because he was a player not a team




You can never compare any result what happen in the past to the current result , because points , rules and playing conditions etc

the only way you can compare is the margin , so Allan jones is wrong in saying what he did

The batsman does not get the run for the no-ball, it goes against extra's so as loudstrat said, there is no change to the cricket scoring system.. His average would still be the same..

 

[Monk]

back to 1908 rules i say! :sarcasm:

:lol:

 

[Gaba]

The batsman does not get the run for the no-ball, it goes against extra's so as loudstrat said, there is no change to the cricket scoring system.. His average would still be the same..

I know i corrected the mistake , i shouldnt have mention a batsman

 

[Gaba]

Gaba seems truly upset

About what ?

 

[adamkungl]

About what ?

the fact that st george (no longer around, bless them) have still had the most tries and goals scored against them in a grand final

 

[Gaba]

the fact that st george (no longer around, bless them) have still had the most tries and goals scored against them in a grand final

First the dragons are still around , so what happen 33 years ago doesnt bother me.

 

[Loudstrat]

the current cricket points has change you get the no ball plus the runs you score off it

so a 6 could be worth 7 and a 4 could be with 5 under the current cricket points system , we are talking about the team score , shouldnt have mention bradman bad example because he was a player not a team




You can never compare any result what happen in the past to the current result , because points , rules and playing conditions etc

the only way you can compare is the margin , so Allan jones is wrong in saying what he did

LOL. Can't compare the scores but you can compare the margins. That'll do me!!!!!!

 

[Hanscholo]

It doesnt matter. Its the score not the way it was added up that counts. I guess melbourne can take some solace in that, like the knights did in 2005 being the highest competition points wooden spoon of all time, in the end we still finished last, and 40-0 is still the GF record margin.

 

[Lungfish]

Alan Jones still waving the flag i see...

 

[Southernsaint]

40 > 38.

Thus ends today's lesson.

Melbourne, the most unsuccessful Grand Finalists ever. End of.

 

[melon....]

There is still one thing that shuts up Saints fans. To lose 38-0 in a GF is a disgrace.


38-0!!! Suck it up ladies.