That's the understatement of the century.Ok TV is over, move on people to the next nothing faux outrage topic.
It was a huge dog act picking up an unconscious player and is f**king stupid too.
Now your turn... Or do you still believe you have to defend him because he plays for QLD?
If it turns out he's made no effort and that storm statement was a lie, I suspect most would wish him to be stripped.
I don't discount he was being an arrogant douche (as I stated in my previous post about it) but I'd like to see both sides of the story.
Not at all. What Smith did was shithouse. I was just interested if Deans theory rang true for players of his own club as well.
Ok TV is over, move on people to the next nothing faux outrage topic.
Paul Gallen coming out in support of Cameron smith and attacking 60 minutes and it's journalist.
sounds so much like the blind Queenslanders trying to rationalise cams actions
So Queenslanders have two options, continue to defend cam and agree with Paul Gallen.
Or disagree with Paul Gallen and criticize their captain.
Let's see their 2 heads struggle with that one
Deans theory didnt entail a player becoming paralysed so it is a completely different scenario. What part of that dont you understand ?
'[insert name] plays for my team, so I have to defend him, because he plays for my team. A player in my team would never do that. Because it's my team.'
That's "paul gallen facts" not paul gallen. Its his parody account.
As Bennett said, Smith got it wrong that night, but I think the ambush journalism by 60mins showing that footage to Alex that he had never seen was in pretty poor taste, they exploited Alex & got the reaction they wanted from him, which was one I can also understand. I don't think the Smith angle did justice to the rest of the story which was pretty moving.
As Bennett said, Smith got it wrong that night, but I think the ambush journalism by 60mins showing that footage to Alex that he had never seen was in pretty poor taste, they exploited Alex & got the reaction they wanted from him, which was one I can also understand. I don't think the Smith angle did justice to the rest of the story which was pretty moving.
The one thing you take out of this whole story, without question, is that Channel 9 are maggots.
Yeah the journalism was pretty shitty (and completely expected with 60 mins). I couldn't believe how many times they replayed the tackle. Was it really necessary?
Oh and the use of the Ed Sheeran song was poor form
"When your legs don't work like they used to before" :shock: