What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Andrew Fifita tells junior rugby league referee: ‘I’ll smash you’

Messages
14,655
Wait a second. Let convicted sex offenders and serious violent offenders play on but ban these two for life for a verbal spray IF what the ref says is true?? No physical violence committed?
Yeah, seems legit.
Where did i say that convicted sex offenders and serious violent offenders should be allowed to play on?
 
Messages
17,517
Wouldn't the process that Penrith JRL took be the same for anyone? NRL star or not. I don't think its like its a special case or anything. Its not like they are going to be suspended for a year or anything.

They met yesterday, made a decision and announced ban this morning.

One would think it's based on referee's report. There has been no time to seek reports from many others at the ground. Particularly when the A grade captain gets on radio and says the ref provoked the situation when all D Fafita asked was can he talk to him about recommencing play whist still assisting an injured player off the ground.

Don't get me wrong, the bone heads should have walked away and deserve punishment, but all the facts need to be gathered before determining what that punishment should be
 
Last edited:

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,545
They met yesterday, made a decision and announced ban this morning.

One would think it's based on referee's report. There has been no time to seek reports from many others at the ground. Particularly when the A grade captain gets on radio and says the ref provoked the situation when all D Fafita asked was can he talk to him about recommencing play whist still assisting an injured player off the ground.

Don't get me wrong, the bone heads should have walked away and deserve punishment, but all the facts need to be gathered before determining what that punishment should be

I'm assuming it would be the same if it was Joe public though.

If not, then I'm happy to be corrected.
 
Last edited:

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,545
Or maybe the ref contributed in this whole situation spiralling out of control.

i think everyone agrees that the fifita brothers have done the wrong thing and that they deserve a hefty punishment. But just because the fifita brothers have done the wrong thing doesn't mean it clears the ref of any wrong doing. Now that holes have appeared in how this story was originally reported by the media, the conflicting arguments from those that witnessed the event and the fact that the key piece of evidence supporting the refs claim has been erased/never existed means that maybe the situation needs to be investigated more

Regardless of what took place, you can't blame a ref for the way the media reported it.

The confusion to me appeared around the confusing terminology of a game being part of a Junior Rugby League, but involve grown men.
 

Last Week

Bench
Messages
3,716
Confronting a referee straight after a game over an in game decision is never going to go down well.

If they had a problem, and were truly concerned with the injured players welfare, they should have taken it up with the competitions admin itself. What is confronting the ref after the game going to do? He can't change anything now.

Idiots.
 
Messages
17,517
Confronting a referee straight after a game over an in game decision is never going to go down well.

If they had a problem, and were truly concerned with the injured players welfare, they should have taken it up with the competitions admin itself. What is confronting the ref after the game going to do? He can't change anything now.

Idiots.

This part is not in dispute lol
 

Last Week

Bench
Messages
3,716
The Cronulla Sharks advise that Andrew and David Fifita have been stood down pending further investigation and to allow them and their representatives to fully address matters relating to allegations of inappropriate behaviour at an A Grade Men's match under the jurisdiction of the Penrith and District Junior Rugby League.

The club has today received, and is reviewing and assessing, statements from a variety of people present at the match including match officials, participating club representatives, ground officials and independent witnesses. In assessing these reports it is evident that conflicting versions of events exist.

There is a process which must now be allowed to occur to give the players the opportunity to review that information and respond and that process is underway.

http://www.nrl.com/fifita-brothers-stood-down-by-sharks/tabid/10874/newsid/88406/default.aspx
 

Last Week

Bench
Messages
3,716
The Club advises that Andrew and David Fifita have been stood down pending further investigation and to allow them and their representatives to fully address matters relating to allegations of inappropriate behaviour at an A Grade Men’s match under the jurisdiction of the Penrith and District Junior Rugby League.

The Club has today received, and is reviewing and assessing, statements from a variety of people present at the match including match officials, participating club representatives, Ground officials and independent witnesses. In assessing these reports it is evident that conflicting versions of events exist.

There is a process which must now be allowed to occur to give the players the opportunity to review that information and respond and that process is underway.

As a part of that process the players have advised they intend to defend the more serious charges levelled against them.

The Club has been advised that the previously reported video evidence of the alleged incident does not exist. The players legal representatives have expressed their frustration in this regard as they were looking to use this evidence to support their case.

The Club reasserts that it takes the nature of the allegations against its players very seriously and is working with NRL CEO, Dave Smith and the NRL Integrity Unit to ensure that due process is allowed to occur and the appropriate sanctions are put in place once all of the facts are established.

The Club advises that out of respect for all of the individuals involved in this matter, including the match officials and the players, this investigation will not be done in the public forum and no further public comment will be made at this stage.

http://www.sharks.com.au/news/2015/07/27/sharks_media_stateme.html

This reads like that there was no recording of the incident at all.
 

DiegoNT

First Grade
Messages
9,378
Find it interesting that the twins legal representatives wanted to use the video evidence to support their case, but now it turns out that the video has been deleted/never existed
 

magpie4ever

First Grade
Messages
9,992
Or maybe the ref contributed in this whole situation spiralling out of control.

i think everyone agrees that the fifita brothers have done the wrong thing and that they deserve a hefty punishment. But just because the fifita brothers have done the wrong thing doesn't mean it clears the ref of any wrong doing. Now that holes have appeared in how this story was originally reported by the media, the conflicting arguments from those that witnessed the event and the fact that the key piece of evidence supporting the refs claim has been erased/never existed means that maybe the situation needs to be investigated more

Some posters trying to defend the indefensible are just making themselves to be ignorant twats, like a so-called moderate muslim trying to defend isis or a so-called christian defending pedo ministers.

They vebally abused and possibly tried to intimidated an official/s, whether or not that official/s made mistakes, is not defendable,
 

MrAnonymous

Bench
Messages
4,070
lol and it was mens match anyway. Nice work adding jnr into it to make f**kwits like magpie4eva carry on like c**k suckers.
 

txta2

First Grade
Messages
5,174
Some posters trying to defend the indefensible are just making themselves to be ignorant twats, like a so-called moderate muslim trying to defend isis or a so-called christian defending pedo ministers.

They vebally abused and possibly tried to intimidated an official/s, whether or not that official/s made mistakes, is not defendable,

Indefensible? Ahaha you win the internets
 

Eion

First Grade
Messages
7,977
Some posters trying to defend the indefensible are just making themselves to be ignorant twats, like a so-called moderate muslim trying to defend isis or a so-called christian defending pedo ministers.

They vebally abused and possibly tried to intimidated an official/s, whether or not that official/s made mistakes, is not defendable,
ISIS and pedos? What a fuggen peanut.
 

Latest posts

Top