What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

annual report 2014

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
The "one anonymous club chair" must be so disappointed, all that work & campaigning and it turns to nothing, hmmm maybe it was never anywhere near a majority of clubs?
NRL and clubs vow to improve communications after meeting avoids 'World War III'

The NRL and clubs have taken steps to improve communication after a four-hour meeting in Melbourne to discuss the future direction of the game and ways they can work together.

Buoyed by an announcement from NRL chief executive Dave Smith that the 491,000 Melbourne viewers for Wednesday night's Origin at the MCG was greater than the free-to-air figures for any AFL match so far this season, the chairs and other representatives of the 16 clubs were upbeat about the state of the game.

While some clubs are believed to be at odds with the NRL over funding, governance issues and the governing body's financial interest in Newcastle, Gold Coast and Wests Tigers, the meeting was described as "productive" and "constructive" by those in attendance.

"I had been to meetings prior to today and yesterday and at no stage did I see anything that led me to believe that World War III was coming or was imminent," said Melbourne chairman Bart Campbell, who has been appointed spokesperson for the clubs.

Advertisement

"It is all part of the dialogue, people have different view points and different agendas but ultimately what we have tried to do is to distil them into a very narrow sub set, focus on those and move forward.
"The end goal is to engage with the commission to get better outcomes for the clubs in terms of the way they run our businesses going forward and that is across a whole raft of areas. It is everything from efficiencies to independence, and people have different views on where the boundaries cross over but ultimately what we wanted to do was make some progress and it was a really good meeting."

Smith also played down talk of disharmony among some clubs and said there had been good debate at the meeting.

"The communication lines are open and they need to be open because we're going to be stronger together than we are individually," Smith said. "If you want to see where the game is headed, have a look at last night, have a look at Origin, have a look at how the season is going.

"There was some very smart people around the table and there were some really good points of view. It was a good, wholesome conversation. There was no controversy.

"The game substantially changed a the start of this [broadcast] rights deal. It was a seismic shift in the game's ability to think about how it distributes the funds and starts to consider growth.

"I think what you're seeing is significant growth potential in the game. For example, in our non-broadcast income you have seen us grow from about 68 million in 2012 to about 120 million today. There will be lots more conversations. Sometimes you agree, sometimes you don't agree but not in a negative way, in a constructive way."

The NRL meets bi-monthly with the club chief executives and quarterly with the chairmen and chairwomen but Campbell said those gatherings may become more regular.
"We don't communicate well and I think one of the issues we are trying to address now is how we communicate and communicate more regularly on issues that matter both ways and it was good," he said.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...ing-avoids-world-war-iii-20150618-ghrj09.html
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,360
Maybe to be fairer the nrl should split what it spends on different areas of the game

All media money on nrl, running it and funding to clubs
All other income to Jnr, grass roots and state bodies a fad international projects and kangaroos.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
I don't think the NRL would mind giving clubs additional funding if they knew it was going toward growing their business and not going toward buying gym equipment. Hence why they introduced benchmarking and incentive payments, but obviously $250k per year isn't enough.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,360
Maybe they need a ring fenced system ie $X for marketing, $X for membership drives etc. clubs won't like that level of control but they've shown not to be able to run themselves well regardless of amount of money they have.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,360
DT just couldn't help turning a positive meeting into a negative with that last sentence!


THE 16 NRL clubs have called a temporary truce with chief executive Dave Smith and the independent commission over the future direction of the game.
Predictions of fireworks at Thursday’s meeting in Melbourne didn’t eventuate with both sides agreeing to a provisional ceasefire while negotiations for future funding of the clubs continue.
Afterwards the clubs nominated Melbourne Storm chairman Bart Campbell as the spokesman.
“It was a very organised and structured meeting,” Campbell said.
“It was also the first time in a long while all the clubs and the NRL spoke positively about working together. It was a very sensible and adult meeting.


“All the issues and everything raised were discussed very thoroughly.”

How long the peace treaty survives is the big question.
One chairman who spoke to The Daily Telegraph afterwards said it would depend on progress made at a follow-up meeting, most likely next month, over funding issues.


http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...e-to-a-ceasefire/story-fni3fbgz-1227404674732
 

Cumberland Throw

First Grade
Messages
6,539
This line worries me the most

It was a very sensible and adult meeting.

Why would anyone need to say that ??

Can it be assumed that some of the other meetings have been "childish"

Is it disturbing that the leaders of our great game and in charge of a billion dollar industry, go into serious meetings and act like children,,,
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
This line worries me the most

It was a very sensible and adult meeting.

Why would anyone need to say that ??

Can it be assumed that some of the other meetings have been "childish"

Is it disturbing that the leaders of our great game and in charge of a billion dollar industry, go into serious meetings and act like children,,,

Probably a response to those who have been shit stirring for months are also those who boycotted the AGM where they could have had their concerns addressed, the same people also refused to allow all clubs to attend another meeting when they put their little show and dance on about the FR and getting KPMG to explain to them what net means. Then there's also the leaking of private correspondence from fellow chairs to the media after being called out on leaking rubbish to the media. All a pattern of people playing immature games instead of acting like professional adults and keeping their concerns in the forum designed for them, the chair meeting. Maybe some have finally awoken to their childish unconstructive behaviour and now are willing to work united with the NRL instead of trying to sabotage it.
 

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
This line worries me the most

It was a very sensible and adult meeting.

Why would anyone need to say that ??

Can it be assumed that some of the other meetings have been "childish"

Is it disturbing that the leaders of our great game and in charge of a billion dollar industry, go into serious meetings and act like children,,,

Nah, generally it just means they were aware of the public expectation (the shit NewsLtd was peddling)...

You hear the same in politics; if theres a private meeting that everyone expects to be petty and fuedal, the spokesman goes out of their way to say how cooperative and amicable it was.

Im more concerned that they took notice of the Telegraphs campaign and felt the need to respond.....
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
Brilliant stuff by the Bulldogs

You could not help but be impressed by the Bulldogs "Back to Belmore" performance on Monday night against the Melbourne Storm. The genuine home ground advantage from playing in front of a packed house brought the best out in the Bulldogs and they blew the Storm off the park in the opening 20 minutes to put the result beyond doubt. Of course, for those of us who have enjoyed history with this great club, it brought back many wonderful memories of past eras playing at this special venue. Naturally all post-match discussions revolved around the feel and romance of the suburban ground versus the commercial reality of maximising revenue to give fans the best possible football team to support. As a one-off experience in a school holiday period the Bulldogs picked the perfect time to revisit their spiritual home. The excitement, colour and noise created by the Bulldog fans all made for an exciting atmosphere and it made the television coverage all the more enjoyable. But despite the big crowd and the obvious enthusiasm around the evening, I doubt such promotions are financially sustainable in the long term. That's why clubs are being forced to take games away from suburban venues to maximise financial returns to make ends meet. Remember, 14 of our 16 NRL clubs lose money every season. It's a battle. Of course, if the NRL clubs were receiving anywhere near the appropriate funding levels they should be getting from the ARLC and the lucrative broadcast rights deals, then the pressure to take fixtures away from suburban grounds would not be so great. Clubs are currently receiving less than half the money they should be allocated from broadcast rights. We shall discuss more on this at another time.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/state-of-origin/g-20150630-gi1qlf

More than double current club funding of $7.55m! So Gould reckons clubs should get over $15m a year! Meanwhile, there is less than a third of central revenue available for the rest of the game, including States, growth initiatives, sustainability fund etc. Who would trust Parramatta to spend $15m a year of games money when they are putting clauses in contracts that incentivise it to be broken?
 
Messages
14,139
States and growth :lol:

I hope they don't take money off Tasmania or there will be negative number of teams there. I guess negative growth could be spun as a kind of growth.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,360
Yes if they took money from WA's jnr system it'd be in big trouble, oh hang on we don't get any lol.

Is this the same Gould who said giving clubs more money to waste is not a wise idea and that slated a suburban ground saying it wasn't fit for nrl?

To be honest, I can also see why the commission might be reluctant to hand over increased funding to clubs. It's fair to say the majority of clubs are guilty of living beyond their means. If the ARLC was to give every club, say, an extra $3 million a year, history tells us the clubs would probably spend $4 million.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...espite-surge-in-revenues-20150314-1446ha.html
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Latest posts

Top