- Messages
- 7,901
Now official for anyone still doubting me
I don’t care who was right or wrong in predicting this. I care about whether or not it was the right decision for the club.
You can’t deny it suggests poor management. Extending the guy last year then sacking him four weeks out from the finals in a year that has, on the whole, been relatively successful. Could you ever imagine a club like Melbourne, the Roosters or Broncos doing something like this?
Please be Fittler.
Ciraldo to see out season. Then Fittler for 2019.
Any chance at this?
At the 60 minute mark it was 30-24 and I knew we had them. But that's not my point here.
You have blamed the poor part on the coach and credited the good part to the players. A bit unfair, it must be said. You are not alone in this around here and whoever gets the job will receive the same treatment.
6. Thinks you get magic energy from grassI said the same thing yesterday and I think it is a very good chance.
1. He has matured since his last NRL role
2. The young blokes think he is a god
3. He has a very smart football brain and doesn't take crap
4. Gus loves him and will pour all of his efforts into making Freddie a success (as will Brady)
5. He would finally be coming home after 23 years
I don’t care who was right or wrong in predicting this. I care about whether or not it was the right decision for the club.
You can’t deny it suggests poor management. Extending the guy last year then sacking him four weeks out from the finals in a year that has, on the whole, been relatively successful. Could you ever imagine a club like Melbourne, the Roosters or Broncos doing something like this?
You should meet some of the bosses I've worked with in my time.Its well known that Griffin is an arrogant prick to deal with
You should meet some of the bosses I've worked with in my time.
I was at the first home game this club played. I would have gone to Belmore the previous Sunday but it was too far for an 11 year old to travel on public transport, according to my Mum. I was also at the second home game, where we thrashed the 11 time premiers.
I think this whole episode has cheapened this club. I'd rather not win another game this year than just gun down a man who has done more than any other coach for this club and delivered success despite injuries and a squad that is the youngest in the NRL.
This meeting clearly has been handled appallingly. It should have waited until after the season was over. We were never winning it this year, maybe next. This just appears to be a clash between two men. Gould should do the honourable thing and hand in his resignation. We will never win a premiership with him either.
I wonder what Ivan Cleary is thinking right now.
6. Thinks you get magic energy from grass
Is that any different than claiming that Gus should be removed for sacking a coach who had brought us success? Ignoring the fact the absolute basket case we were when Gus came here.
Emotions are high right now. I get it. But saying Gus should be out the door asap is insane. First (and foremost) we have no knowledge about how the rift came about and who caused it. Secondly if were going on performance, Gus absolutely stays. Our roster has only gotten stronger since he got here. Lower grades are firing. Griffin gets credit for steering the team to a strong position in spite of injuries/origin, but Gus gets none for setting the club up to have such a deep roster?
He's done a fantastic job so far. If the club goes through the floor over the next few years then we talk.
Am I the only one that thinks that the rumors of Gould and ciraldo were the actual coaches and not hook seem to be correct now? I can see the situation being they allow hook to take over again as we are travelling well we then loose 5 from 7 or whatever it was and the come from behind against Canberra was the final straw.
This is all just conspiracy theories in my head but wouldn't be surprised.
It could also be a play to keep Nathan.
Same thing happened at the Roosters. BY the way if it is true that Ciraldo and Gould are the "true" coaches then it is they who created these very piecemeal performances from a team brimful of talent.Am I the only one that thinks that the rumors of Gould and ciraldo were the actual coaches and not hook seem to be correct now? I can see the situation being they allow hook to take over again as we are travelling well we then loose 5 from 7 or whatever it was and the come from behind against Canberra was the final straw.
This is all just conspiracy theories in my head but wouldn't be surprised.
It could also be a play to keep Nathan.
I agree. But you won't have him. He will leave us in 2020 for the rootersNathan’s gone Vic..
Get that into your head
The whole Cleary family hates Gould.
It’s called Karma...
I get what you are saying and I had the same belief too. However, my point is, those are two clubs we should have collected two strong wins against.At the 60 minute mark it was 30-24 and I knew we had them. But that's not my point here.
You have blamed the poor part on the coach and credited the good part to the players. A bit unfair, it must be said. You are not alone in this around here and whoever gets the job will receive the same treatment.
We were really only significantly inferior to the Raiders in the six minutes before half time anyway.
Nathan’s gone Vic..
Get that into your head
The whole Cleary family hates Gould.
It’s called Karma...
I don’t care who was right or wrong in predicting this. I care about whether or not it was the right decision for the club.
You can’t deny it suggests poor management. Extending the guy last year then sacking him four weeks out from the finals in a year that has, on the whole, been relatively successful. Could you ever imagine a club like Melbourne, the Roosters or Broncos doing something like this?