A coach should be left to do his business. Not getting help shouldn't lead to being fired. Especially if the rumours are true and he had no say in naming the team.
I am hoping he unleashes on NRL 360. Like he is gone but need to fix issues of Gus butting in for the next coach... Assuming that happened
Hmm, it is not entirely true to say "a coach should be left do his business". The models for a modern leader have moved on significantly from the old style directive "I'm the boss, I know best". A key skill for any leader is their ability to network with others and collaborate in the wider organisation. How do you encourage a team to play as team when as the coach, you are not a team player?
The other thing that is so obvious in all walks of life and industries, people just won't cop leaders who won't allow them input and listen to what they have to say. Controlling leaders make people feel devalued and worthless. It takes time, but eventually they just leave.
And my final point is this, if there is one quality in a leader that should scare you if you are a CEO or on a board, it is the "hero" quality. The "I can fix this and do it all because I'm a hero and heroes don't need help" type of leader. It is only a matter of time before they stuff up and drop everybody in it and you won't know until its too late, because they won't ask for help. I have come across people like this many times in business and their ego won't let them ask for help. A senior executive wanting to be "just left to do my business" is a warning sign for a future cock up and staff leaving. Unless they are perfect of course, in which case leave them too it.......
Maybe Hook has seen too many Clint Eastwood movies and thinks he is Dirty Harry, he doesn't need any help, just his magnum 45 and in his case, a clipboard.