If we had Norman and Sailor as our halves, who would you rather we keep to play hooker, disregarding salary, Hunt or McInness?
I would keep Hunt. I think he adds more variety, flair and attack from dummy half. He also provides a kicking game from dummy half. When the play the ball is near the sideline he can also be a link man in attack or be an extra running half. (He did that for Qld this year).
I think Norman would thrive taking on the dominate playmaker role and steering the team around the paddock, I would even consider making him captain. Hunt would give us X factor at dummy half, maybe similar to Cook for Souths and Sailor would give us X factor in the halves. Maybe Hunt would become more consistent at hooker? I see a lot of attack in that 6,7 and 9. Playing behind a dominate pack, they could really excel. We would then need a top line fullback to top the spine off, Valentine Holmes is the one I would have in mind. Hopefully we can get Flanno and Holmes and then if young Flanno lives up to wraps, we can get him to replace Norman is 2 or 3 years time. Imagine a spine of
1 Holmes
6 Sailor
7 Norman
9 Hunt.
That could be a premiership winning spine. There is certainly a lot of attack there. Lomax and Scott as centres sounds good to me too. Then we would a pair of up and coming wingers on low money,(they can be up and coming centres or fullbacks starting their careers on the wings too) someone such as Billy Smith would be an example, but it sounds as if he rejected us. Simonsson from Canberra is another example of a cheap young up and coming winger we could target? (he has Rapana and Cotric ahead him) I wouldn't be looking at spending big money on wingers. Maybe the Matt or Max Feagai or Ramsey could step up and be those wingers in the next 2 or 3 years?