- Messages
- 19,873
I told you.Theres a free one in my album on here.
The rest you may have to pay for.
Cop out. The one in your album goes alright, but Cliffy & Dani are leaving you for dead.
I told you.Theres a free one in my album on here.
The rest you may have to pay for.
Who says it's less shallow?
I don't care for the 'type' thing, in purely physical terms anyway.
No one has ever said that to me. Ever.
I think he is referring to you Twizz.
I wouldn't take that lying down.
It's not shallow to have a physical type. It's not like people sit down and go "Well, what kind of people am I going to exclude from my selection - therefore making it harder for me to find a suitable mate?"
Attraction is attraction. I don't get angry if a girl doesn't find me attractive because I myself have had somebody interested in me who I was not interested in before.
We're programmed on an evolutionary level and as a part of just growing up to find certain kinds of people attractive. Some of us like 'em scrawny, some of us like 'em fat, some of us like 'em ginger. And thank God. If we all just had the same type, we'd be f**ked as a species. And it's just not feasible to expect people to like everybody and judge solely on personality. That's not what our biological imperative is.
You sound offended.
You try so hard to be PC don't you.Yeah...I didn't say it was shallow I said I didn't care for it. As in I don't have a physical type range. I don't care what others think about types. I couldn't really give a shit about what biological imperative my genes have.
You try so hard to be PC don't you.
Now you know thats not true.you normally do