You're right in regards to club records but this isn't a record he set for the Bulldogs, it's one he achieved for the competition. My memory isn't great but I think the NRL had something for Andrew Johns after he became the highest point scorer, I could be wrong on that.
But I agree when players get a certain record the club acknowledge that record but from and overall competition perspective I think the NRL should recognise it. But that's just from a fans perspective.
IIRC That Andrew Johns affair was a courtesy organised by PARRAMATTA.
Surely the Bulldogs could have approached the Roosters/NRL with a 'here's how we should honour Noddy' plan a few weeks prior to the game, rather then letting it happen and bitching about it post mortem??
The NRL would have most likely helped fund/helped plan anything they brought forward, but i don't think that it's their responsibility to approach the club.
I agree, the clubs are the one who run the game day, they can do what they want on ground after the game, I don't know why it is up to the NRL to sort out, when the Dogs and the Roosters should have had a pow wow and gotten it together. Both clubs had players celebrating a milestone and a few weeks out you could have seen that. Hell all they needed to do was get a microphone out on the ground, and present one game ball to Noddy, and one to Braith, with different plaques.
The Dogs are well versed in this, they did a thing this year when they played the warriors to honour Steve Price, I am quite sure the NRL had nothing to do with that either.
are the dogs actually upset over it? ... or is it just a media driven NRL bashing? .... damn media
well there you go!i know its more media bull crap, but rlw has confirms barrett is returning to temora
So it's going to be announced this arvo I take it.
i know its more media bull crap, but rlw has confirms barrett is returning to temora
so has he retired yet?