You're right in regards to club records but this isn't a record he set for the Bulldogs, it's one he achieved for the competition. My memory isn't great but I think the NRL had something for Andrew Johns after he became the highest point scorer, I could be wrong on that.
But I agree when players get a certain record the club acknowledge that record but from and overall competition perspective I think the NRL should recognise it. But that's just from a fans perspective.
IIRC That Andrew Johns affair was a courtesy organised by PARRAMATTA.
Surely the Bulldogs could have approached the Roosters/NRL with a 'here's how we should honour Noddy' plan a few weeks prior to the game, rather then letting it happen and bitching about it post mortem??
The NRL would have most likely helped fund/helped plan anything they brought forward, but i don't think that it's their responsibility to approach the club.
I agree, the clubs are the one who run the game day, they can do what they want on ground after the game, I don't know why it is up to the NRL to sort out, when the Dogs and the Roosters should have had a pow wow and gotten it together. Both clubs had players celebrating a milestone and a few weeks out you could have seen that. Hell all they needed to do was get a microphone out on the ground, and present one game ball to Noddy, and one to Braith, with different plaques.
The Dogs are well versed in this, they did a thing this year when they played the warriors to honour Steve Price, I am quite sure the NRL had nothing to do with that either.
are the dogs actually upset over it? ... or is it just a media driven NRL bashing? .... damn media![]()
well there you go!i know its more media bull crap, but rlw has confirms barrett is returning to temora
So it's going to be announced this arvo I take it.
i know its more media bull crap, but rlw has confirms barrett is returning to temora
so has he retired yet?