What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Battle of Brisbane - Won

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
67,087
When NRL can get 33,000 fans turn up to a game and 96,000 watch it on telly in Melbourne, Adelaide or Perth then we can gloat!
 

ParraEelsNRL

Referee
Messages
27,694
Perth Red said:
When NRL can get 33,000 fans turn up to a game and 96,000 watch it on telly in Melbourne, Adelaide or Perth then we can gloat!

Did last year for the Parra game.

And the Storms first game on FTA against the Tigers had well over 200,000 watching on TV.
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
gurudave said:
Stupid thread. I follow both sports but the Broncos game was an obvious first choice to watch. I can't really see any reason why it was a "war won" by the rugby league? Of course the Broncos game was going to attract a bigger crowd and it always will. The only sh*t game that league should be compared to is rugby union.

It was a war because AFL deliberately put a big game up against rugby leagues centenary celebrations in QLD. And they were smashed.
 

lotti

Bench
Messages
4,168
ParraEelsNRL said:
Did last year for the Parra game.

And the Storms first game on FTA against the Tigers had well over 200,000 watching on TV.
No AFL on and it was a prelim at the Dome which holds more than OP and it was on in prime time normally NRL is on 12am down here.
 

ParraEelsNRL

Referee
Messages
27,694
lotti said:
No AFL on and it was a prelim at the Dome which holds more than OP and it was on in prime time normally NRL is on 12am down here.

So what, the AFL has free reign every Saturday night and they still don't get that.

The Lions and Swans have had semis with no opposition and they have been around the same.
 

lotti

Bench
Messages
4,168
most of the AFL teams are based in and around Melbourne and there's most probably more than one AFL game on. The Swans and the Lions are in NRL mad cities, they also have 2 fan bases 1 in Sydney and Brisbane and the other in Melbourne since the Lion have the old Fitzroy fans and Sydney have those that remember the South Melbourne Bloods who the Swans used to be.
 

In-goal

Bench
Messages
3,523
Insular inward looking fools, honestly it was a fantastic night for the city of Brisbane which clearly puts it ahead of Sydney and all you can do is revert to OZTAM in which you hate when compared to ACN.

Rugby Union is the rival, not the southern code.
 

ParraEelsNRL

Referee
Messages
27,694
In-goal said:
Insular inward looking fools, honestly it was a fantastic night for the city of Brisbane which clearly puts it ahead of Sydney and all you can do is revert to OZTAM in which you hate when compared to ACN.

Rugby Union is the rival, not the southern code.

Most people here are not worried about either game, they both suck, we just like to rub their noses in it because what ever Fumbleball forum you go to and what ever fumbleball newspaper you look at always puts the boot into RL and constantly tells everyone how they rule everywhere.

This just shows their arrogance up for what it is, as you said, the Southern code.
 

The Tank

Bench
Messages
4,562
In-goal said:
Insular inward looking fools, honestly it was a fantastic night for the city of Brisbane which clearly puts it ahead of Sydney and all you can do is revert to OZTAM in which you hate when compared to ACN.

Rugby Union is the rival, not the southern code.

This started when the Loins boss told the NRL and the Broncos to move their game to Sunday. It's like the Storm telling the AFL when to play in Melbourne.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/ne...-the-qld-public/2008/03/29/1206207499799.html
AFL fails to ignite the Qld public

Thomas Arup | March 30, 2008

THE AFL's claims of widespread support for a second Queensland team will come under scrutiny after the Brisbane Lions-Collingwood game on Friday night was beaten in the ratings by more than three-to-one by the telecast of the NRL game in Brisbane between the Broncos and Townsville.

A Channel Seven spokesperson yesterday said the Lions-Pies two-point thriller averaged 96,000 viewers in the Queensland capital, compared to 327,000 for the Broncos' 36-2 win over the Cowboys. The figures were confirmed by a Channel Nine representative.

"It is the first time we have gone live on a Friday night," the AFL's chief broadcasting and commercial officer Gillon McLachlan said yesterday. "It's unfortunate that the game clashed with a local derby, but the Lions will continue to have strong support in Queensland."

The figures are disappointing for the AFL, which is seeking to install a second AFL side on the Gold Coast by 2011.

Speaking on ABC radio on Friday night, Graeme Downie, a key player in the consortium hoping to establish a Gold Coast team, said he believed the AFL was fighting a "rear-guard action" against rugby league in the area. "Rugby league to a large extent captured the hearts and minds of a lot of Gold Coasters," Downie said.

While the Lions-Pies match wasn't among the top-10 rating shows in Brisbane, it was the highest rating show in Melbourne with an average of 474,000 viewers — 100,000 more than any other show.

The NRL derby was played on the 100th anniversary of the founding of Queensland Rugby League and was the highest rating show in Brisbane on Friday.

The AFL match at the Gabba had just over 33,000 spectators; the Broncos-Cowboys match at Suncorp Stadium had a near capacity crowd of 50,000 — a Broncos club record.

The two games were of markedly different quality — the derby quickly became a disappointing 34-point blow-out, while the Lions stormed home in the final quarter to win by two points.

Downie, a former Brisbane Lions chairman, said on Friday that the AFL had not officially researched the level of support for a Gold Coast team, a comment strongly denied by McLachlan yesterday.

"That's absolutely wrong," McLachlan said. "We have been doing detailed brand and support research for over five years."

When asked if research showed support for a Gold Coast team McLachlan said: "Absolutely, there seems to be a lot of support. We have had that on the public record for some time."

Last week, AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou said the foundations of a Gold Coast team could be established as early as next year, with the side to play in the local Queensland league and the appointment of key administrative staff.

Demetriou played down reports the Gold Coast team would have to play at the Gabba in Brisbane until 2016 due to a contract with the Queensland Government.

"We're very confident in our ability to make sure that we respect the terms of an agreement, but at the same time you can always re-negotiate," Demetriou said.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,272
dallymessenger said:
:lol: :lol:

96,000 on FTA for a "national" sport.

deary me

All I know is the Storm rate better when shown live or Prime Time in Melbourne (on the few occasions they've been shown ie round one 2007) than the Swans do in Sydney.
 

Lockyer4President!

First Grade
Messages
7,975
El Diablo said:

Love that bit at the end about the AFL not doing actual research other than brand awareness on the GC.

Also :lol: at this.

Vlad: We're adding a GC AFL team and the QLD government will build us a new stadium
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Fine, we're still adding the new team but we'll base them at an upgraded Carrara.
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Oh that agreement we signed, I forgot about that. We didn't really mean it anyway, can we please play at Carrara?
Bligh: lol no.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
150,960
Lockyer4President! said:
Love that bit at the end about the AFL not doing actual research other than brand awareness on the GC.

Also :lol: at this.

Vlad: We're adding a GC AFL team and the QLD government will build us a new stadium
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Fine, we're still adding the new team but we'll base them at an upgraded Carrara.
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Oh that agreement we signed, I forgot about that. We didn't really mean it anyway, can we please play at Carrara?
Bligh: lol no.
:lol:
 

Razor

Coach
Messages
10,077
In Brisbane Friday night

The League - 327,000
The AFL - 98,000

The AFL didn't make the top-20 programs for the day.
 

Glenn

First Grade
Messages
7,310
Razor said:
In Brisbane Friday night

The League - 327,000
The AFL - 98,000

The AFL didn't make the top-20 programs for the day.

And probably the reverse in Melb.
 

Brownie.Kougari

Juniors
Messages
1,652
Lockyer4President! said:
Love that bit at the end about the AFL not doing actual research other than brand awareness on the GC.

Also :lol: at this.

Vlad: We're adding a GC AFL team and the QLD government will build us a new stadium
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Fine, we're still adding the new team but we'll base them at an upgraded Carrara.
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Oh that agreement we signed, I forgot about that. We didn't really mean it anyway, can we please play at Carrara?
Bligh: lol no.

lol! can someone please put that on an AFL forum?

:lol:
 

Digga Hole

Juniors
Messages
340
ParraEelsNRL said:
Did last year for the Parra game.

And the Storms first game on FTA against the Tigers had well over 200,000 watching on TV.

Both without direct competition. I was at the Parra game, but there was no AFL game on in the city at the same time.

I think the AFL, and the NRL for that matter, would be very happy with their numbers for Friday night.
 

Digga Hole

Juniors
Messages
340
Lockyer4President! said:
Love that bit at the end about the AFL not doing actual research other than brand awareness on the GC.

Also :lol: at this.

Vlad: We're adding a GC AFL team and the QLD government will build us a new stadium
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Fine, we're still adding the new team but we'll base them at an upgraded Carrara.
Bligh: lol no.
Vlad: Oh that agreement we signed, I forgot about that. We didn't really mean it anyway, can we please play at Carrara?
Bligh: lol no.

Now thats funny.
 
Top