So take it to its conclusion and see if it still makes sense.
Let's say a player tested positive for PEDs instead of cocaine, and got a 12 month ban. His club doesn't feel like paying him for a year to sit on his ass, so they sack him. Does that player have to hold an NRL contract in order for the ban to take place? Does the next club that signs him have to sit him out for a full season before he can take the field?
NRL's done him a favour banning him. Can earn more money and live in a nicer place.. Result!
So take it to its conclusion and see if it still makes sense.
Let's say a player tested positive for PEDs instead of cocaine, and got a 12 month ban. His club doesn't feel like paying him for a year to sit on his ass, so they sack him. Does that player have to hold an NRL contract in order for the ban to take place? Does the next club that signs him have to sit him out for a full season before he can take the field?
Anyone found guilty of PEDS would be dealing with ASADA or WADA, not the NRL.
Since when did Barba take peptides? It was cocaine ffs.
Honestly I love this game but a vast amount of supporters are complete and utter imbeciles.
The peptides scandal was years ago, learn to move on for f**ks sake.
Or he could do a willie mason, be a total clusterfck, get kicked out and never achieve anything again lol
TBh I don't blame him. Sth of France is lovely and they will be throwing silly money at him. If he can adapt to their way of life and the boringness of ruggers remains to be seen.
Anyway... Time will tell.
That's true Adam.
If they had registered the contract when the Sharks lodged it, he would have served the ban and be back mid season.
They wouldn't so there is no contract.
Like you said, toys have been tossed out of the cot, but can hardly blame him. If the NRL sat on registering the contract for months, he would then start the ban.
That's true Adam.
If they had registered the contract when the Sharks lodged it, he would have served the ban and be back mid season.
They wouldn't so there is no contract.
Like you said, toys have been tossed out of the cot, but can hardly blame him. If the NRL sat on registering the contract for months, he would then start the ban.
As to that situation, I'm not sure. It isn't the first time the NRL have stalled on contracts over serial dickheads, it's sort of consistent in their own inconsistent way... see: Foran, Carney, etc.
They don't really have any obligation to register a drug banned player who wasn't mentally fit according to his club, merely weeks ago. How mentally fit do you need to be for an offseason break? Must have been pretty bad.
Does anyone know what they actually required of Barba in regards to welfare, commitment, etc? And why they weren't or couldn't be satisfied in a timely manner?
Since when did Barba take peptides? It was cocaine ffs.
Honestly I love this game but a vast amount of supporters are complete and utter imbeciles.
The peptides scandal was years ago, learn to move on for f**ks sake.