I don't know what he's on but I do know that my club wouldn't have let him go without another club offering a substantial amount more than what we were prepared to pay. Hunt isn't in the Thurston category of elite halves but this a guy we've nurtured all the way to where he is now, we wouldn't be letting him go for peanuts, he's a good player.. I just don't think he's THAT good of a player.
Millward would be downplaying what the contract is, probably so realist Dragons fans don't start throwing their arms around in disbelief, I don't think he's on more than a million but he wouldn't be on less than 850k either. I don't know what he's on and neither does anyone else in this forum but from a Dragons perspective it has to be alarming that we could have retained him if it was around that million dollar figure, given we went out and got Jack Bird. Bird's contract was initially reported as 3 years for 2.1 mill, then later it was 4 years for 4 mill, so somewhere in between there is what we were able to spend, we chose not to on Hunt, be that because we don't value him or be that because the Dragons offer was significantly more, only Hunt and his management know the answer. I lean towards the latter, simply because he's a natural half whom we have had in our system since 2008, you don't devalue someone 9 years after you brought them into the grade.
Bennett has always had an opinion on Hunt too, back at the Knights he wanted to sign him to Newcastle, Hunt stayed.