- Messages
- 20,281
Okay let's reverse engineer this.
The ump gave Gilly not out.
He walked.
Ump has no say.
And yet, Hughes continued on. Ump has a say.
Okay let's reverse engineer this.
The ump gave Gilly not out.
He walked.
Ump has no say.
And yet, Hughes continued on. Ump has a say.
But Gilly didn't.
It seems the rules are different in this.
Umps must be arbitrary.
Jesus Christ mate, let it go, he was given not out.
It wasn't like it was McCullum and the Channel 10 producer was saying not out. It was Daniel f**king Hughes wearing concrete boots and unable to hit it off the square.
But Gilly didn't.
It seems the rules are different in this.
Umps must be arbitrary.
He looks like the ‘after meth’ photo.fekete what a star...
Gilly knew he hit it. Completely different situation.
It wasn't conclusively out, Hughes saw that on the screen and stopped walking off. So what?
It's not even a storm in a teacup. It's a storm in a thimble
Again you have misunderstood my point.
Well perhaps your point should consist of something a bit more expository than "he walked"....walking does not indicate a batsman is out. The sheer number of times the fourth official stops them on the boundary while they check a no ball is evidence of this.
Anyway who cares? I agreed with the not out decision based on the shit quality zoom.
Lol
Again that's not the point.
I'll ask you, as you seem chatty, although easily agitated.
Do you consider this real sport or something similar to WWE?
Lol
Again that's not the point.
I'll ask you, as you seem chatty, although easily agitated.
Do you consider this real sport or something similar to WWE?
So what, then, is the point?
And what a ridiculous question.