Maroubra Eel
Coach
- Messages
- 19,044
Enjoy the season of deathriding fellas.
How pissed off will you be if the club is successful?
We all want the team to be successful.
Have you read this thread? Do you know what it's about?
Enjoy the season of deathriding fellas.
How pissed off will you be if the club is successful?
The guy is the head of a criminal organisation.
Technically, Al Capone was only guilty of tax evasion. Would he have been a good fit for sponsorship?
We all want the team to be successful.
Have you read this thread? Do you know what it's about?[/QUOTE]
I do.
At face value it is question of a corporate sponsor with a legitimate business on one hand, and an association (at the least) with a criminal organisation on the other amd who may be facing criminal charges in that context. A sensitive question of corporate ethics with no clear cut answer.
However for a few other posters it is more of an opportunity to continue an ongoing agenda which infects every thread.Hence the tricky ethical question of accepting sponsorship from an otherwise legitimate businessperson because of his associations (as opposed to any existing convictions or proven activities) gets distroted into a polarised position. There are innuendos that the board is dealing with organised criminals (by the same group of posters who regularly make innuendo about the heritage of the Club chairman to infer involvement in organised crime).
The same posters are so quick to pounce on any negativity; so gleeful in doing so, that they come across as a bunch of death-riding narks whose agenda is so important that it surpasses their interest in the team and CLUB being successful.
So yes Iknow what it is about. Do you?
We all want the team to be successful.
Have you read this thread? Do you know what it's about?[/QUOTE]
I do.
At face value it is question of a corporate sponsor with a legitimate business on one hand, and an association (at the least) with a criminal organisation on the other amd who may be facing criminal charges in that context. A sensitive question of corporate ethics with no clear cut answer.
However for a few other posters it is more of an opportunity to continue an ongoing agenda which infects every thread.Hence the tricky ethical question of accepting sponsorship from an otherwise legitimate businessperson because of his associations (as opposed to any existing convictions or proven activities) gets distroted into a polarised position. There are innuendos that the board is dealing with organised criminals (by the same group of posters who regularly make innuendo about the heritage of the Club chairman to infer involvement in organised crime).
The same posters are so quick to pounce on any negativity; so gleeful in doing so, that they come across as a bunch of death-riding narks whose agenda is so important that it surpasses their interest in the team and CLUB being successful.
So yes Iknow what it is about. Do you?
Bigfella you have taken on the role of the Board's door bitch with gusto and I gotta say that you are doing a fine job. Relentless. Love the passion mate.
:thumb
Eric is that you, aren't you busy at the inquiry into the electricity sell off?The purchase price of a business has sfa to do with its turnover or profitability.
The purchase price of a business has sfa to do with its turnover or profitability.
The purchase price of a business has sfa to do with its turnover or profitability.
The purchase price of a business has sfa to do with its turnover or profitability.
If the earnings don't travel with the sale of the business the purchase price will be negligible.
Tattoo parlour would be a classic example. It could make a fortune because of either the particular artist or an association with a particular market. If those didn't remain the business could and probably would evaporate overnight.
Highly lucrative accounting businesses for example, are regularly valued at zero dollars in some contexts.
And businesses with low current turnover but significant potential often sell for big dollars.
Pretty juvenile responses.
I don't know that I'd expect much more from people who hunt in a pack.
Tell me, do you all agree with gronk and maroubra that flood victims with no insurance don't deserve to receive government or charity assistance? Wouldn't surprise me.
I'll await the next round of well argued, mature responses. Better wai until your kid get home from daycare to write them for you though.
If the earnings don't travel with the sale of the business the purchase price will be negligible.
Tattoo parlour would be a classic example. It could make a fortune because of either the particular artist or an association with a particular market. If those didn't remain the business could and probably would evaporate overnight.
Highly lucrative accounting businesses for example, are regularly valued at zero dollars in some contexts.
And businesses with low current turnover but significant potential often sell for big dollars.
Pretty juvenile responses.
I don't know that I'd expect much more from people who hunt in a pack.
Tell me, do you all agree with gronk and maroubra that flood victims with no insurance don't deserve to receive government or charity assistance? Wouldn't surprise me.
I'll await the next round of well argued, mature responses. Better wai until your kid get home from daycare to write them for you though.
If the earnings don't travel with the business then you're not selling a business, you're selling off assetsIf the earnings don't travel with the sale of the business the purchase price will be negligible.
how to defend the undefendable 101If the earnings don't travel with the sale of the business the purchase price will be negligible.
Tattoo parlour would be a classic example. It could make a fortune because of either the particular artist or an association with a particular market. If those didn't remain the business could and probably would evaporate overnight.
Highly lucrative accounting businesses for example, are regularly valued at zero dollars in some contexts.
And businesses with low current turnover but significant potential often sell for big dollars.
Pretty juvenile responses.
I don't know that I'd expect much more from people who hunt in a pack.
Tell me, do you all agree with gronk and maroubra that flood victims with no insurance don't deserve to receive government or charity assistance? Wouldn't surprise me.
I'll await the next round of well argued, mature responses. Better wai until your kid get home from daycare to write them for you though.
If the earnings don't travel with the sale of the business the purchase price will be negligible.
Tattoo parlour would be a classic example. It could make a fortune because of either the particular artist or an association with a particular market. If those didn't remain the business could and probably would evaporate overnight.
Highly lucrative accounting businesses for example, are regularly valued at zero dollars in some contexts.
And businesses with low current turnover but significant potential often sell for big dollars.
Pretty juvenile responses.
I don't know that I'd expect much more from people who hunt in a pack.
Tell me, do you all agree with gronk and maroubra that flood victims with no insurance don't deserve to receive government or charity assistance? Wouldn't surprise me.
I'll await the next round of well argued, mature responses. Better wai until your kid get home from daycare to write them for you though.