Bobby DIGital
Coach
- Messages
- 12,731
You were in a Broncos v Cowboys game thread on a Raiders fansite? No, you?re not a strange fellow at all?..:?
It just goes to show how obsessed he is with us Raiders fans.
You were in a Broncos v Cowboys game thread on a Raiders fansite? No, you?re not a strange fellow at all?..:?
Austin won't have to do too much to outplay Milford this week :sarcasm:
.
Didnt have to do much to outplay Milf. But still didnt outplay Milf
Im just happy he got through the game tbh.
I thought he was solid tbh but what i was most impressed by was that he didnt over play his hand like he could do in quiet games last year. He more or less played what was in front of him and let sezer do most of the fancy stuff.
All shit aside Austin is obviously a very good player. However when a player was virtually invisible all night (which after coming back from a 4 week injury is understandable) to say 'I was impressed he didn't overplay his hand' is stretching it and trying to find something to compliment him about.
he didn't overplay his hand because he never played any hands, look at his stats
8 runs for 46 metres, 3 missed tackles and that's all she wrote
Pete Cizash said:He was pretty solid against the dogs. He did what he was good at and backed up, took the line on,etc without blowing tries and taking terrible options. He could have had a couple of tries if a link man connected with him (i think it was him who would have gone length of the field if lee got the ball to him)
The canberra 1,6 and 7 compliment each other quite well. Throw in one of the best 9s in the game and its a good spine. I wouldn't want austin as a primary playmaker though where a guy like milford can do that
he didn't overplay his hand because he never played any hands, look at his stats
8 runs for 46 metres, 3 missed tackles and that's all she wrote