Yeah Boyd has been awesome for us lately, just needs to get rid of his shit play-the-balls where he tries to milk a penalty, aka almost every single one.
I've got a theory on that which could be absolute pie in the sky and I'm happy for it to be called as such.
But anyway, could it be a deliberate ploy to get most of our team back onside and ready to take hitups at the start of sets deep in our own half?
The whole quick play the ball is always best theory is not necessarily always true. There are plenty of times where the defence can rush you and pin you down while all your forwards are struggling to get back.
Boyd comes across as a little bit annoying and lazy so it may well just be a trait of his, but it doesn't seem like something WB would look at not care to mention to him unless he was okay with it.
Similar to the way he never runs the ball back from a kick. At first it really bugged me, but then I noticed whenever he gave it one of our elusive wingers they would always do quite well making ground, Boyd would get into dummy half and have a really good scoot or do something else productive, and that little bit of 'time wasting' led to the team getting themselves into formation.
I suppose I'm pondering: is it better to eke out those extra 5 metres every time, or is better to build a set with structure and all hands on deck in the belief those 5 metres will be more than made up for by the end?
I have no doubts people are going to shoot this one down, but it's a theory.
Also, on at least one occasion against the Sharks Boyd was 100% within his rights to complain and should have got a penalty. And another time either that game or the one before he did get a penalty.