What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

gong_eagle

First Grade
Messages
7,655
More mud slung in Stewart controversy

Dylan Welch Police Reporter | March 14, 2009
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/new...art-controversy/2009/03/13/1236919566435.html


EVEN moving house has become an exercise in mud slinging in the Brett Stewart controversy, with sources close to the stood-aside footballer saying the family of his alleged victim did not choose to leave but were evicted from their townhouse.
The claim comes as it is revealed that Stewart's manager, George Mimis, is a friend of and lives at the same property as Philip Mudge, the landlord of the townhouse complex where the alleged attack occurred.
Two conflicting versions of why the family are leaving are being investigated by police. Mr Mimis says the family has been evicted because of two bad cheques. But the father of the family says they are leaving of their own volition because of threats from fans.
Mr Mudge, a retired surveyor, developed the complex in North Manly where both Stewart and the family of his 17-year-old alleged victim were living.
Property documents state he owns all 13 townhouses, which are each worth more than $1 million.
He is also a friend of Mr Mimis, who has dabbled in property development. Mr Mimis lives in the same house - divided into two residences - as Mr Mudge. He bought his second-floor home from the developer in 1998 for $910,000.
Mr Mudge, who is recovering from a hip replacement, could not be contacted yesterday.
Mr Mimis, who manages some of the code's most well-known players, acknowledged the connection but yesterday said there was nothing untoward about his involvement with the man who is now said to be evicting the family of his client's alleged victim.
"I live above him; we're friends. There's nothing wrong with that," he said.
The family's eviction had nothing to do with his relationship with Mr Mudge, and was about unpaid rent, he said.
Rumours were being circulated yesterday by several sources close to Stewart that the father of the 17-year-old had given two cheques for rent and bond that had failed to clear. Mr Mudge had then decided to evict the family, the sources said.
The father said that was not the case, and the family was leaving because of threatening phone calls from Manly fans and because of media scrutiny.
"I spoke to the agent today to break our lease and he's completely OK with it. [The allegations of bad cheques are] untrue.
"If your daughter had been assaulted and that creep is living two doors up from you and you've been getting [calls from] the fans and all that, what are you going to do? Go outside and have a barbecue?"
The father also said he was not concerned about people spreading gossip about him, including his past criminal conviction on fraud-related charges.
"Let them say whatever they want. Everyone wants to portray me as the biggest bastard and I'm OK with that. That doesn't change what happened to my daughter."
 

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
I thought he wasn't meant to talk to the media again. Now he's labelling Stewart as a creep.

The father is suss, no two ways about it.
 

Kiki

First Grade
Messages
6,349
yeh i thought the cops said he shouldnt be talking to the media. he isnt doing himself and his daughter any favours thats for sure.
 

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
He isn't sounding like a concerned father imo. If my non-existant daughter had been sexually assaulted, the last thing I'd be doing is talking to the media.

He's getting his fraud on again imo. Seedy mofo.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
He isn't sounding like a concerned father imo. If my non-existant daughter had been sexually assaulted, the last thing I'd be doing is talking to the media.

He's getting his fraud on again imo. Seedy mofo.

Yeah as a Manly fan... but you're not biased at all either :sarcasm:
 

Kiki

First Grade
Messages
6,349
maybe he and the Durazza father and daughter can go on the road together. speaking enagements and the like.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
Yeah and as a Parra fan your not biased against Manly at all either :roll:

What's being a Parra fan got to do with anything? I'm not old enough to remember the so called 80's rivalry and to be honest do not give a toss whether it's Manly, Penrith, Cowboys or even Parra. I'm attempting to be looking at this situation from a neutral point of point of view, something that cannot be said for others.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
Are you Kiki? If you say you are then I shall believe you. Though I don't know what team you support etc. I ask because a lot of people seem to be jumping on the bandwagon. If a media article is against Brett Stewart then they criticize it, but if a media article is in support of him they happily accept it as the truth. Some such as bartman and others sit on the fence and wait to see what has been presented and then decide.
 

Kiki

First Grade
Messages
6,349
im a dragons fan for the record.

i am neutral as far as im not a manly fan, and brett stewart isnt one of my fave players or anything.

but i will admit i am giving stewart the benefit of the doubt on this because he has never been in trouble before.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
What's wrong with sitting on the fence and waiting until all the facts are heard?

Well, all that will be heard...

Nothing, in fact I commend it and more people should do it.

I think it's very judgemental for people to assume Stewart is guilty, but at the same time I think it is even more judgemental to assume an alledged victim is guilty of lying and deceiving for financial gain which certain people are stating.
 

Latest posts

Top