Dutchy
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,887
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
FMD next you will be telling me that someones Mum is a good alibi.
Just about as good as the father giving evidence.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
FMD next you will be telling me that someones Mum is a good alibi.
Just about as good as the father giving evidence.
You sure ? Way I read it was they were Stewarts words to the father
Lets think for a second , if this was your daughter how would you react?
Delusion is common status quo of this forum
Actually thats a good question.
Why is there no report of a scuffle between the pair. Surely a father on the scene of his daughters "rape" would be in the redzone.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.![]()
I don't have every bit of information obviously (and we have to remember unless there has been a ruling to the contrary some of the evidence has been suppressed and cannot be mentioned) but on what has been released and the cash that Manly will throw at this. It is perhaps likely he will be found not guilty. It is difficult to prosecute a "he said she said" type of case.
Some of you people have no idea though. The criminal process is slow to get it right. I know that Manly fans are invested in this trial but lets not get silly.
Manly shouldn't be paying a cent towards Stewart's defence
if they are then it should be included in their cap
What does Mr Stewart do for a living?why compare this to a workplace?
if they want to pay then that is fine but it must be counted in the cap
This will be lucky to get to trial by November. The DPP has to present it's indictment and it needs to be listed.
It was always going to get past committal. It's basically a rubber stamping committee these days. A case needs to be ridiculously weak to not get past committal. And Stewart's sh*tty "I don't remember" defence was always going to be laughed out of Mags. Different story come trial time .Quote t-ba
Your kidding right?
Maybe if the offence is car stealing.Not sexual assault.