Greenbits
Juniors
- Messages
- 434
That wasn't the sole reason I gave.
It's definitely a factor though and it has helped Manly land more Friday night games. Melbourne haven't received as much luck due to their location more than anything else.
And you can hold onto your theory. Personally, I believe some clubs are always going to rate more than others and are better advertisements of our game by and large than others.
First comment: No. People have previously tabulated onfield success v television appearances and have demonstrated there is only slight correlation. Some teams will always appear on TV regardless of how they are performing, others will never appear on TV regardless of how well they are doing.
Your second comment: Obviosuly some teams are always going to rate better, I'm not saying that they won't. The Broncos for instance have essentially an entire state supporting them - of course that translates to more people watching them on TV. However, the discrepancy between teams will continue to grow while certain teams get FTA and others don't. That is my point. Penrith will never have the fan base the Broncos have but it might be a bit more even if they got half the games on FTA that the Broncos get.
Not to mention that FTA exposure translates to more attractivness to thrid party sponsors = better buying power for elite players = more onfield success. I in no way blame the Broncos for this (though I resent having them as my only FNF option week in week out). But surely any reasonable person realises that this is something that the NRL need to address in the new TV deal.
Last edited: