What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Broncos R19 in Brisbane.

Messages
4,067
Eisenhuth very good against big bodies but a lack of mobility badly exposed by small, nimble players in the middle of the paddock. If Penrith are at full strength they will easily capitalise against him.
His lack of mobility against nimble players was exposed in the run away Staggs try when he failed to wrap up the guy who handed the ball to Staggs. Sloan has been blamed for allowing that try but after Eisenhuths slackness Sloan was forced to make a desperate but fruitless dive to stop him.
Eisenhuth is not so good against big bodies either unless he goes low which he does not do often. Mostly he will try to hold the big unit until help arrives.
 
Last edited:
Messages
4,067
I thought Kyle did a lot of organizing, very busy pointing and telling the boys what to do and urging them to push up, it was very noticeable.
:100: That impressed me too. Add his 3 LBA and 3 TA and it was his best game since way back in the trials against the Tigers and it was done without Hunt on the paddock. From memory he played well too the last time Hunt was absent. More than a coincidence?
 
Last edited:

denis preston

First Grade
Messages
8,458
After such a domination of the first 50 minutes they should never have let their forwards take control in the last 30. I was surprised the Broncos forwards were able to rise in the 2nd half after being smashed till then but the referee helped by only refereeing one side on the 10m in the 2nd half and some timely odd penalties and seemingly random set restarts against us.
That’s my reading of the game as well. Does our power game take it out of us because we should have still had some energy the last 15 mins . A lack of a true leader or the fact that with the quality we have it’s expected?
 

Illusion

Bench
Messages
2,987
:100: That impressed me too. Add his 3 LBA and 3 TA and it was his best game since way back in the trials against the Tigers and it was done without Hunt on the paddock. From memory he played well too the last time Hunt was absent. More than a coincidence?
Said many times Hunt needs to go ..... 7 years as our play maker and he has got us nowhere ........ I will be dirty big time if they renew his contract .......
 

RedVee

First Grade
Messages
6,326
My mate in Kentucky has been watching all year. I think this week was the first time he has had a Saints game. (He gets one game a week, most weeks). He still says “Rugby” though, and watches Union games sometimes not really knowing before the game starts that it is different. But he says he enjoys NRL the most of the games he gets to see.

He messaged me afterwards, “are Brisbane known as a dirty team?”. He especially didn’t like them throwing the ball at Sloan after the tries.

Unfortunately I think he is becoming a bit of a Roosters supporter.
 

TheRev

First Grade
Messages
9,392
I think Max F scores if he just gone himself. The indecision to pass or dummy to Rav cost us a try. Either option taken fully and we most probably score.
100% its something I remember in Moga and maybe a little in MattF, im not sure if its because they are coming up from reserves, but they dont have that killer instinct baked in 'yet'.. they hesitate just for a split second and thats all it takes, probably not wanting to do the wrong thing by the team by not getting bundled into touch or been seen to be selfish by not passing etc.. but I think the more games they play in 1sts, the more confident they get to back themselves.

Its actually one of the things ive always felt right back to the Mundine G/F no-pass in 1999, everytime u throw a ball in traffic there is a chance it gets knocked down or intercepted or fumbled/dropped.. if its even remotely a 50/50 call, id always prefer if the player just went himself, I think the odds of success are much higher, not to mention usually worst case u play the ball and go again.
 

since77

Juniors
Messages
2,082
I think Max F scores if he just gone himself. The indecision to pass or dummy to Rav cost us a try. Either option taken fully and we most probably score.

100% its something I remember in Moga and maybe a little in MattF, im not sure if its because they are coming up from reserves, but they dont have that killer instinct baked in 'yet'.. they hesitate just for a split second and thats all it takes, probably not wanting to do the wrong thing by the team by not getting bundled into touch or been seen to be selfish by not passing etc.. but I think the more games they play in 1sts, the more confident they get to back themselves.

Its actually one of the things ive always felt right back to the Mundine G/F no-pass in 1999, everytime u throw a ball in traffic there is a chance it gets knocked down or intercepted or fumbled/dropped.. if its even remotely a 50/50 call, id always prefer if the player just went himself, I think the odds of success are much higher, not to mention usually worst case u play the ball and go again.
too true. How many times do you see a bombed try on the edges (from all teams) and the guy who bombs the try passing or trying to pass the ball to the winger ends up over the line himself?
 
Top