perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 26,664
ssssshhh. stop talking sense.Their miss ratio is nearly identical. The article is misleading.
it wouldn't matter if they weren't. Buderus is a far superior defender. if the missed tackle column shows him having a few more, they will be due to him being involved in tackles in which he had no right to be in the first place, in most instances. league fans seem to come unstuck so often by relying too heavily on stats in their judgement of players (guilty myself at times). a 0.5 difference in missed tackle ratio and suddenly someone is a horrible player. i'm not even sure a sample size of 7 odd games is enough to have any solid indicators either way. perhaps it's getting there.
add to this that the Knights have played pretty much nothing but the top 4 teams thus far this year. it's also a factor. let's see what happens to all the stats that everyone loves so dearly after the Knights have a few easy ones, and the Tigers a few more tough ones. not that the Tigers have had any easy ones this year - they make everything look difficult at the moment... with Robbie being a substantial contributor. i seriously don't get it - before CvC we had heaps of Tigers fans in here saying themselves that Farah shouldn't be picked based on the past 18 months of form, let alone just this year. now, they get a little sniff - 1 good game from him in god knows how long, and suddenly it's an abhorrent thought for him not to be picked. hopeless. dead set hopeless. there was very, very little controversy or debate about who the form NSW hooker was a week and a half ago.