innsaneink
Referee
- Messages
- 29,368
Only a bunch of f**ktards would give themselves a name like that.
But yeh, only on the drink ? Not likely and my guess is this is what it's all about.
LOL...yep, more than likely
Only a bunch of f**ktards would give themselves a name like that.
But yeh, only on the drink ? Not likely and my guess is this is what it's all about.
Because unlike Manly, we don't pretend our players have done nothing wrongReality is none of us do. Greenberg called a press conference to tell everyone that he couldn't tell people anything. So far there has been plenty of speculation as to what may or may not have happened but I think anyone who is saying Greenberg has handled it well is getting way too far ahead of themselves. I don't feel sorry for Barba at this stage because I still have no idea what he has done or what the issues are. At the same time, I'm not about to judge or disparage him for the same reason.
Proof or that comment is worthless...
Because unlike Manly, we don't pretend our players have done nothing wrong
There's a f**king difference between posting opinion, discussing Barba's issues and the way this has all been handled (positively or negatively)... than to posting libellous, unproven, unfounded and very clearly defamatory opinions/information etc.
Bag the club, bag Barba, bag the NRL... but don't start saying "you heard this" or "the NRL/Bulldogs/Greenberg are covering up".
If you can get sued for saying it in public, you can get sued for saying it on here. Pretty f**king simple concept.
There's a f**king difference between posting opinion, discussing Barba's issues and the way this has all been handled (positively or negatively)... than to posting libellous, unproven, unfounded and very clearly defamatory opinions/information etc.
Bag the club, bag Barba, bag the NRL... but don't start saying "you heard this" or "the NRL/Bulldogs/Greenberg are covering up".
If you can get sued for saying it in public, you can get sued for saying it on here. Pretty f**king simple concept.
Good to know - that's the only thing I'm getting at. The reality of a connected world like we have now is that anybody can hear or see what you say and you are liable for it. In this website's case, they're hosting such comments and as has happened in the past with different websites, that can have far-reaching consequences.ok fair enough Timmah - I understand insinuation is as libel as an accusation or even an admittance.
I've not necessarily believed or trusted Bulldogs management in the past (i.e. 2002-2008), but I'm far more inclined to trust in the practices that the current management has in place.But seriosuly then, u are a Dogs fan, I suppose you will tow the line and go along with what we've heard and are all privy too and you are more than content to believe that.
I believe we quite clearly haven't heard all there is. I also believe if the club thinks it's in Ben's best interests to not have those details made public, then I trust the club's judgement. You can call that naivety, that's fine. But that's what I choose to believe.Put your own opinion down then, do u believe everything we've heard is all there is? Simple as that?
Do you think there may be more to it or it really doesn't interest you either way?
Are u able to have an opinion or is your role just to make sure no one else does?
What the f*ck? What should he do-grin, bow down and yell "jolly good palm, sir!"