mean_maori_mean
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,251
Mate, we are talking about 17 and 18 year old kids here. Those attitudinal skills come much later, not at that level.
No idea mate,
and second of all half the team are 19,20
Mate, we are talking about 17 and 18 year old kids here. Those attitudinal skills come much later, not at that level.
He clearly makes selfish, short-sighted decisions to win football games the easiest way possible.
We need a 20s coach who makes the best decisions in relation to the club - not to take shortcuts.
Damn. All I know is the wrong people keep leaving...The ones you want to leave just hang like a fart in an elevator
Like I said .. he is the right person to be leaving.
Anybody of understanding or can read between the line will realise that.
Do you not think the Glenn etc would of signed off this potential culling with out evidence and reasoning why
Remember when there was that article about Mara not taking the advice from elliot. I can only imagine this is the same - this year it looks like they have changed their philosphy regarding development.
Taken some of his power away - I.e promote havili & laumape.
The Under 20s coach position in most organisation is less important in many systems. That junior recruitment or development person should have the say.
They are the ones shaping these player to the benefit of the club and helping their transition.
The under 20 coach - should just coach the bloke he gets and follow the same song sheet to what the club are trying to do.
Look at the tigers they won with Todd Payten coaching last year - first time rookie coach and whilst they are doing crap they have juniors coming through.
Look at the raiders - they;re 20s coach won the comp, coached the Junior Kangaroos and stepped back to take the mantle of recuitment/development.
People think Ackland make these kids ...are kidding themselves.
He isnt even involved in scouting them or signing them or getting them ready for 20s.
Which he always get quoted in doing so.
He gets them handed to them.
Who should replace him - doesnt really matter if you set the right systems up.
It should just be a fundamentally sound coach - someone enthusiastic and buys in to the whole system
Young up and comer.
why, because he adopts a winning mentality ?Like I said .. he is the right person to be leaving.
Anybody of understanding or can read between the line will realise that.
Do you not think the Glenn etc would of signed off this potential culling with out evidence and reasoning why
The Under 20s coach position in most organisation is less important in many systems. That junior recruitment or development person should have the say.
They are the ones shaping these player to the benefit of the club and helping their transition.
The under 20 coach - should just coach the bloke he gets and follow the same song sheet to what the club are trying to do.
People think Ackland make these kids ...are kidding themselves.
Who should replace him - doesnt really matter if you set the right systems up.
Ackland should have a role at the Warriors - just not his current one. Seems to me that he's a great scout posing as a coach right now. Perhaps he should just focus on the scouting side of things and let someone else handle the development side.
Ackland is probably still upset about his Mt Albert mate - Bluey getting the heave ho.
why, because he adopts a winning mentality ?
Glenn wouldn't know his arse from his elbow. Glenn's info would be coming from league infobot, Scurrah.
absolute bullshit.
Who develops them ? The coach.
Who recruits them _ Its certainly not Dean Bell. Most 'recruitment is word of mouth through schools/clubs. You watch the quality rise with the advent of College league.
he is, it works, the crap starts when the player/s get shunted to NRL. Something the U20's coach has no say in. Ackers should tell ME to get stuffed, Ackers should be working closely with Willie Swann and the Vulcans.
who does then ? you have run a complete circle. Of course the coach makes the kids. Ask the kids, they'll tell you who has the biggest influence on their careers ..
Guys like Sam Lousi, Palavi had NRL potential and should of been ready to go in the NRL - but instead have taken time in Vulcans until they are even considered for selection.
As an outsider I'm a bit of both angles being argued on this one
Warriors 20s sides have been dominant more on the size of the players rather than the skill of the players. It isn't hard for the big Polynesian boys to get noticed and look good, because they have the raw strength and power advantage over most of the other sides, it doesn't always need good coaching to get them the win
As an example of that we have Hurrell, absolutely ridiculous stats in the 20s, he dominated them with sheer power. It was all well and good at that level, but after a week or 2 playing against men at the next level with that being the only dimension to his game, he was found out reasonably quickly.
Now is the part where Acklands 20s coaching comes into the equation, did he actually try and coach a bit of skill and nous into his game, or just leave him to run over blokes which worked fine at that level ?
Ultimately the 20s is about trying to prepare the talented players to take the next step, and that is an area the Warriors are behind some other clubs at the moment
There shouldn't be tension between Ackland & ME. Bell is the football manager - he should tell Ackland what he requires not leave it to ME to tell Ackland.
Like Bell being the recruitment manager. Who worthwhile have we recruited lately?
It is probably tension vs all other staff.
Ackland not listening outcome = Ackland getting the flick.
I cant blame them if that is thier stance, dont take crap from players or staff alike.
speculation. unfounded speculation
Big fan of the tongan centre Kata - looks to have the x-factor and reading the match report even kicks goals