Bye bye Fui.

[Maroubra Eel]

Yeah thats right Colonel,the reflux problem:lol:

 

[CharlieF]

Neither has Moimoi.

It was proven that MoiMoi did not bite anybody.

It was proven that Dunley did not intentionally spit on anybody.

Case is closed on these ones.


Next.

 

[mickdo]

It was proven that MoiMoi did not bite anybody.

It was proven that Dunley did not intentionally spit on anybody.

Case is closed on these ones.


Next.

He still spat on him, by your own admission :lol:

 

[Cletus]

After seeing it again, 9 weeks. He belted Kennedy in the head 4 tackles before he hit Kite. He' gone with his record.

 

[CharlieF]

He still spat on him, by your own admission :lol:

There was a player that said that he was bitten by MoiMoi. It wasn't completely proven that he didn't. Do we still want to continue this stupid arguement?

 

[The Colonel]

After seeing it again, 9 weeks. He belted Kennedy in the head 4 tackles before he hit Kite. He' gone with his record.

Grade 3 Reckless tackle - 7 weeks with early plea.

http://www.leagueunlimited.com/article.asp?ID=11599

He was only charged with the hit on Kite not the hit on Kennedy. Can we ask the NRL to rule on a few of the high tackles that Jarryd Hayne copped as well if you are going to worry about the one he wasn't cited for?

 

[Maroubra Eel]

Just watched a replay. Jarryd Hayne killed it against the Manly backs.

The more they got fired up, the more he tore them apart. Great stuff.:thumb

 

[mickdo]

There was a player that said that he was bitten by MoiMoi. It wasn't completely proven that he didn't. Do we still want to continue this stupid arguement?

Oh please. Fui was not proven to have bitten White end of story. Dunley was proven and convicted of spitting on an opposing player, but had it thrown out on appeal because of his reflux rubbish excuse. Stop being a moron.

 

[CharlieF]

Oh please. Fui was not proven to have bitten White end of story. Dunley was proven and convicted of spitting on an opposing player, but had it thrown out on appeal because of his reflux rubbish excuse. Stop being a moron.

Guilty or not guilty???

 

[mickdo]

Guilty or not guilty???

That wasn't the question. The question was spitter or no spitter.

 

[Cletus]

So they didn't charge Dunley? :shock: :shock: :shock:

 

[mickdo]

So they didn't charge Dunley? :shock: :shock: :shock:

I guess the MRC figured he was a protected species grub after his last ridiculous appeal, so why bother charging him.

 

[tbone10]

Dunley wasn't the one who knocked out a guy cold with a swinging arm...

 

[V1er]

But what if dunley had done damage to hayne which he very well could have, Dunley should have been charged with dropping knees regardless if he hurt the player or not

 

[mickdo]

So now you only get charged if you hurt someone??? wtf are you on tbone

 

[MSIH]

But what if dunley had done damage to hayne which he very well could have, Dunley should have been charged with dropping knees regardless if he hurt the player or not

You Parra fans love the "what if's". First it's, "What if Kite wasn't knocked out?", and now it's, "What if Hayne was injured?".

 

[V1er]

hey im only pointing out what tbone said, and pretty much said dunley didnt get cited cause he didnt knock the player out, thats total BS, Its an act of foul play on dunleys behalf that should have been cited.

 

[tbone10]

Dunley missed Hayne. I would have preferred him to actually get the little crumb, perhaps it would've brought back down to earth. And i would have preffered Dunley to get suspended. But the fact is Dunley missed him.

 

[mickdo]

Just about every week there is someone up for a dangerous throw charge where the player isn't injured. Just because Dunley is so useless that he can't spit properly or drop knees properly doesn't change the fact that he still attempted it and is a grub.

 

[CharlieF]

Just about every week there is someone up for a dangerous throw charge where the player isn't injured. Just because Dunley is so useless that he can't spit properly or drop knees properly doesn't change the fact that he still attempted it and is a grub.

If he attempted it, he would have been cited. Like I said before, Hayne over reacted to it, the touchie over-reacted to Hayne's over reaction, and then finally Clarke over reacted by placing it on report and awarding a penalty.

Come Monday when only cool heads are looking at the video, and you come up with the same conclusion, everyone over reacted to nothing.

If Dunley wanted to put the knees in, they would have went in and not missed.