Bye Bye Latrell

[Saxon]

Deserves at least a week, but I suspect the judiciary will let him off.

Well, if you can't fit the judiciary under the sombrero, what use is it?

 

[Lambretta]

Normally I would be defending a Roosters player because well my team. Plus well, its Latrell and our attack is nowt without.

But my defence is this.

Any tackle involving the injury of CatManDuges should not be cited

 

[Albert Rosenfeld]

Latrell is the GOAT. He cannot be punished.

 

[JJ]

Why must they? We have a right to contest it.

You still haven't answered my question re: tackle on Latrell earlier this year that was very similar resulting in Latrell being carted off without so much as Cleary being cited.

LMAO - the Cleary tackle isn't similar at all - purely accidental - the Chambers tackle is similar, but worse

 

[gregstar]

if he's contesting the charge, then the club must already know he'll be exonerated.

 

[OzDragon]

if he's contesting the charge, then the club must already know he'll be exonerated.

Uncle Nicky got dis

 

[Life's Good]

Argue all the technicalities of body positioning etc. but the fact remains he went in/around the head & neck which, last time, I checked was a no no. If the NRL is consistent he gets a holiday.

This, of course, means he will be cleared and given an apology for wasting his time.

 

[carcharias]

Had to laugh at Gould
Reckons the roosters can’t beat the rabbits without him.

 

[Lambretta]

Had to laugh at Gould
Reckons the roosters can’t beat the rabbits without him.

Mr Gould is correct. Well, nearly correct.
The Roosters are highly unlikely to beat Souths as they will be playing the Dragons..... according to my mate who is a Dragons fan

 

[BennyV]

I think the best thing for Latrell would be to take the early plea and cop the week off. Sure, it means he won’t play again in 2018, but it also means that he can postpone getting bitchslapped by the REAL best young centre in the game, the Great and Powerful Zac Lomax!

 

[Valheru]

Very Similar? lol... They are no where near the same...

Yes one resulted in a player taking no further part in the game and the other didn't.

 

[Valheru]

if he's contesting the charge, then the club must already know he'll be exonerated.

He gets a week either way, what club wouldn't contest?

 

[wittyfan]

Had to laugh at Gould
Reckons the roosters can’t beat the rabbits without him.

They barely got past Cronulla. Still think it will be Souths-Melbourne GF.

Latrell will be lawyered up and will get off.

 

[carcharias]

They barely got past Cronulla. Still think it will be Souths-Melbourne GF.

Latrell will be lawyered up and will get off.

He has written off the Dragons already?

 

[jargan83]

Argue all the technicalities of body positioning etc. but the fact remains he went in/around the head & neck which, last time, I checked was a no no. If the NRL is consistent he gets a holiday.

This, of course, means he will be cleared and given an apology for wasting his time.

 

[age.s]

Yes one resulted in a player taking no further part in the game and the other didn't.

This Cleary vs Latrell tackles is an incredibly stupid line of posting. They're completely different tackles, with Cleary's being completely accidental.

Give yourself a spell and/or an uppercut.

 

[Perth Red]

Are lawyers counted in the football cap?

 

[Danish]

Argue all the technicalities of body positioning etc. but the fact remains he went in/around the head & neck which, last time, I checked was a no no. If the NRL is consistent he gets a holiday.

This, of course, means he will be cleared and given an apology for wasting his time.

Don’t forget the salary cap exemption next year, for pain and suffering

 

[Life's Good]

Don’t forget the salary cap exemption next year, for pain and suffering

No need for a salary cap exemption when you manage it so well.

 

[Danish]

No need for a salary cap exemption when you manage it so well.

Getting JT out of retirement is expensive