What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bye Bye Latrell

jack coburn

Juniors
Messages
475
rorters have the worst forward pack out of all the teams left. They beat a busted dragons but won't go close to the scabs. He's a goose but Napa owns the burgi and without him they will roll over them all night .could be a flogging,
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,019
"Given Mitchell's profile in the game and the importance of games at this time of year, even NRL boss Todd Greenberg made a brief cameo at the back of the hearing."

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/mi...ty-verdict-20180911-p5034a.html?crpt=homepage

Why the hell was Greenberg there? Greenberg's job is to run the game, not the Roosters.


I think it quite obvious Greenberg was down there to ensure the suspension stuck.

He was hopping mad earlier in the year when the match review committee didn’t punish Napa the way he wanted
 
Messages
15,492
Sean Garlick was one of the judiciary panelists. Lol.

Lattrell had no chance of getting off and shouldn’t have gotten off.

Dugan is lucky his head didn’t fall off.
 
Last edited:

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
"Given Mitchell's profile in the game and the importance of games at this time of year, even NRL boss Todd Greenberg made a brief cameo at the back of the hearing."

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/mi...ty-verdict-20180911-p5034a.html?crpt=homepage

Why the hell was Greenberg there? Greenberg's job is to run the game, not the Roosters.

He was there to talk about the judiciary outcome they had decided upon when they cited Mitchell.

He did read from the script didn't he?
 

2010Dragons

Bench
Messages
4,038
Are you sure? 10,000 comments from dumb NRL fans, loaded with conspiracy theories, were telling me on Facebook that we had already bought the judiciary and the NRL wanted us to win..... now with this weird development i wonder if this is all a ploy to convince everyone (for now) that we aren't officially supported..
I don’t do fake news Facebook. So I can’t comment. But, what I do know is whatever uncle nick wants uncle nick gets.
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
Crusher tackle
Bloody dangerous.
Harsh penalty but it’s no secret that shit is going to get you suspended.
Bet he doesn’t do it again.
 
Messages
15,492
I think it will be bloody hilarious that after Uncle Nick shelled out $2 Million for Cronk & Tedesco they once again fail to reach the GF.

Even funnier if Souths knock them out.
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
14,365
Greenberg it seems does not agree with Ray Hadley's 'good of the game' argument. Justice served.

Latrell may have inadvertently dropped the 2018 premiership. Along with fellow moron team mate Dylan Napa.
 
Messages
15,545
What people fail to realise is that he wasn't rubbed out for this tackle. He was rubbed out because he had carry over points from a previous crusher tackle that when added to the points from this tackle cost him a one week suspension.

If he didn't have a prior and carryover points, he takes the early plea and wouldn't have missed a week.

He was rubbed out for two illegal tackles in a short period of time.

If you're sitting on 95 carryover points going into the finals serious then you need to make damn well sure you do the right thing.

Roosters fans crying over this have completely missed the fact that he's done this twice now and he wouldn't have been suspended otherwise.
 

Latest posts

Top