Generalzod
Immortal
- Messages
- 34,131
Geez that’s pretty hard to do Perth when every team and their fans expect resultsClubs are still spending above their means. Let’s not give them even more opportunity to go bust!
Geez that’s pretty hard to do Perth when every team and their fans expect resultsClubs are still spending above their means. Let’s not give them even more opportunity to go bust!
Agreed and 300 gamers get a 50% reduction.Cam Smith can f*ck off....
But i actually agree with the sentiment. If every club has the same money ($200k i think), then the whole thing is meaningless.
If we want to encourage long-serving, loyal players, we need to give clubs a mechanism to keep them. And not just players above 300 games.
Let clubs exempt a % of a players salary if they pass a certain number of games for the club (100 game = 10%, 150 games = 20%, etc). That way, players are rewarded for sticking around and clubs can build squads with a long-term goal.
Should the diamond ring be included in the salary cap?its not his go, not now after playing over 400 games, should be salary cap exemption, and NRL pay cam out there own pocket
scoring more tries than your coach, the goat of Melbourne now
Should the diamond ring be included in the salary cap?
its not his go, not now after playing over 400 games, should be salary cap exemption, and NRL pay cam out there own pocket
scoring more tries than your coach, the goat of Melbourne now
If he does then I hope Jeremy Latimore comes out of retirement too.God I hope he goes again next year