Cameron Smith

[1999]

it'll be interesting, im sure he'll be cited, but i think they'll fight it hard, they'll highlight countless other grapples in the same game from brisbane that go unpunished, they'll say they didnt even choke him, it'll be like inglis on eastwood all over again, i think he mite get charged, fight it and get off, we all have to remember, it might look bad, but no one was injured, its a tough game, and maybe the panel might decide the penalty was sufficient, im more worried about crocker, that WAS a grapple and he has a horrible record at the judicary, he mite find himself in some trouble

 

[Butters]

can anyone tell me when it was in the game i havent watched it yet ?

About 20mins into the 2nd half, watch out for when Sam Thaiday has a sook.

 

[SadShark]

Gould, Johns & Geyer have no problem with it.................oh, and obviously no agenda either..........yeah right.

 

[Miller was a legend]

Wouldn't be surprised if they dont call it a grapple but sight him for careless tackle to head and/or neck. If so he may only go for one match.

As for Gus' opinion. Well it's just that his opinion, it's not like he is always right.

 

[jc155776]

they'll highlight countless other grapples in the same game from brisbane that go unpunished

Not allowed to do it.

Can only compare with other incidents when they were charged and got free.

 

[Twizzle]

deserves a week but its th Storm and its a GF,

he'll get off imo

 

[Dummy Spit Johns]

we all have to remember, it might look bad, but no one was injured, its a tough game,

A drunk crashes a car into a crowd, but nobody gets hurt, so we let him off!

You are deluded!

 

[1999]

your deluded if u think them 2 scenarios are comparable, clown, the same thing happened with inglis and eastwood and he walked, there's one case they CAN show to the judiciary. if there's any consistency, he'll walk too.

 

[Noa]

your deluded if u think them 2 scenarios are comparable, clown, the same thing happened with inglis and eastwood and he walked, there's one case they CAN show to the judiciary. if there's any consistency, he'll walk too.

Yeah, if they can only use examples that have been to the Judiciary, thats the one they'll use.

On the downside for Cam he was a-lot more aggressive then GI was.

 

[badav]

About 20mins into the 2nd half, watch out for when Sam Thaiday has a sook.

I think was a fair complain considering Cameron Smith made no other attempt to tackle him other than to grab his neck.

 

[Jimmy]

Wouldn't be surprised if they dont call it a grapple but sight him for careless tackle to head and/or neck. If so he may only go for one match.

As for Gus' opinion. Well it's just that his opinion, it's not like he is always right.

I'm told Johns and Geyer agree with Gould.

 

[no name]

I'm told Johns and Geyer agree with Gould.

And they are totally impartial judges. :roll:

 

[Miller was a legend]

LOL Johns works with the Storm, hardly independent. Geyers brother plays for them. Did you notice Geyers response. LONG PAUSE and reluctantly says, No. Not like Geyer not to shoot off his mouth quickly

 

[kkingston]

Johns and geyer both have links to the storm.

 

[Frailty]

He should be charged and should get the two weeks. It's a shame because you want to see Melbourne at full strength coming into these last two games, but if he put himself in that position.

Wouldn't be surprised to see Melbourne let off again though.

 

[kkingston]

 

[no name]

Wait for it.....

Still images are decieving :lol:

 

[Frailty]

And it only gets worse from there!

 

[_Johnsy]

if smith does not get at least 1 week off it is a disgrace. Yet we have ass licking scum melbourne fans trying to defend his actions. The club full of grubs.

 

[Frailty]

if smith does not get at least 1 week off it is a disgrace. Yet we have ass licking scum melbourne fans trying to defend his actions. The club full of grubs.

Don't be surprised when he gets off.