Three idiots suspended from the Bridge, pending life bans
Good to see
those douchebags on the train ?
:lol: you'd love to have all three in your starting side.no hopefully terry ivanovic and costa
:lol: you'd love to have all three in your starting side.
That's why he wants them banned from Chelsea
None of your squad are better. Pompous or not. There isn't a single player who would get a run in our first XI. Probably not even our second XI.
:lol: typical pompous chelski supporter just like their players, I was referring to the 3 you named, terry is well past it these days and ivanovic is well over rated.
As for the rest of your insecure drivel, must suck being only barely able to beat our "3rd stringers" over 120 mins with the most boring football in all of Europe and on the wrong end of the scoresheet most times :lol:
There's a reason why you lot are labeled pompous have a think about it
Disappointing 2 points dropped, should have been over by half time.
Barnes basically karate kicks Ivanovic: http://gfycat.com/FlusteredRadiantCricket
Kightly blocks a shot with his arm: http://gfycat.com/WarmheartedWarlikeBlesbok
Costa is shoved over: http://gfycat.com/UnhealthyReflectingArabianwildcat
That man Barnes again: http://gfycat.com/EvenLoathsomeHound
Barnes will be retrospectively charged right?
Chris Waddle on 5 live: "It's the worst challenge in football whenever anybody goes over the top. Even Gary Lineker or somebody like that would have reacted because it was a shocking challenge. I'm not saying Ashley Barnes deliberately did it but it was a leg-breaker. It's not in the rule book but basically we should analyse Nemanja Matic's response as a quick reaction. He's got to two when counting to 10, and any other player in the world would have done what he did."
:lol: bitter much? And you call me insecure....
There's a reason why you lot get a few labels too..
what exactly have i said that's bitter? i've given you facts. and where there is opinion such as my evaluation of terry, i've given a substantive reason behind it.
looks to me like you're struggling for a response.
No because they're all pompous twats
Substantive reason? Where is it?
That it?