magpie4ever challenging bunnieswoman in this thread for the dumbest merkin on LU I see...
You asked a question, dude. I answered the question.
I'm on a tangent - get serious.:roll:
And I asked a question and you have no f**king answer to it.
I asked a rhetorical question, one that didn't need answering.
You then answered it, while first completely misunderstanding the rhetorical question I posted.
Boxing and UFC are doing alright, legally.
The rhetorical had nothing to do with popularity! Please learn to read
I answered it - it is a contact sport, you can never eliminate injuries.
Anyway, stirred enough shite for today - I'm out of here.![]()
Coming from a dropkick like you, I take that as a badge of honour.
You goose.:lol:
Sorry dude - intelligence doesn't shine through via this blog. I see you change your grammar and added an additional word to make it rhetorical, the second time around. Sad:crazy:
And it's such a nonsense that we had to do it because of the legal implications.
UFC and boxing are doing alright, aren't they?
Boxing is on a steep slope to nowhere in this country, outside of the few world rated boxers.
UFC is just for the X-box brigade to see their games come to life (it is shit).
I answered it - it is a contact sport, you can never eliminate injuries.
Anyway, stirred enough shite for today - I'm out of here.![]()
Ok, I'm thinking you're part of the ARLC.
I'm going to ask you questions and we'll see if I can guess which commissioner you are.
Do you look like you've got AIDS?
We are all being trolled by the ARLC with the banning of the shoulder charge.
magpie4ever getting absolutely cleaned up.
Mate, I've been blindsided by 14 islanders. Hammered.![]()
You're an idiot.
ME:
YOU:
My post was in regards to legal implications, clearly. You responded by going off on a tangent and talking about the respective popularity and demographics of boxing and mma, as if it had anything whatsoever to do with my comment.
What is sad is that you can't read, can't accept mistake and keep making an arse of yourself.
Is he an ARLC commissioner... Or is he Rothfield?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BF4a3Yy0swQ
Is this legal? Ball runners lead with the shoulder all the time. Are they not allowed to now?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66wK9zAppHc&feature=related
How many of these are illegal?
For those like magpie4ever who was saying tackles are clear-cut arms around affairs, watch no.11. Barrett clearly tries to wrap his arms around but Grothe comes off the point of his shoulder. Penalty or no?
No. 13 Gidley clearly gets his arm around but the hit comes from the shoulder. If it's a tackle it still has the g force of a shoulder charge, the reason why they're illegal no?
No. 9 Villasanti has him arms out but Graham bounces off his shoulder.
No. 8 impact comes off Sandow's chest.
No. 6 comes off Laurie's arm.
No. 5, again, impact comes off the shoulder and the player bounces off as he is wrapping his arms around.
No. 2 is by the attacking player, it will have just as much g force but will players be not allowed to that if they see a defender coming at them from the side?
No. 1 is a great hit, proper shoulder charge, and oh look, he's completely fine.
How many of these will be penalties? I'd say the refs will react straight away and say all of them.